Prediction of effective lens position (ELP) and its changes in different monofocal intraocular lens (IOL’s)

Author:

Pereira Savio1,Ganesh Sri2,Umarani Ramya3,Sute Smith Snehal4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Phaco Refractive, Nethradhama Super Speciality Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India,

2. Department of Phaco and Refractive, Nethradhama Super Speciality Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India,

3. Department of Phacorefractive, Nethradhama Super Speciality Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India,

4. Department of Phaco (Cataract) and Refractive Surgery, Nethradhama Super Speciality Eye Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India,

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate effective lens position (ELP) is more accurately predicted by anterior chamber depth (ACD) alone or by ACD + ½ lens thickness (LT) and to compare the ELP and refractive outcome of different monofocal intraocular lens (IOLs) in patients undergoing phacoemulsification. Materials and Methods: A total of 122 eyes with senile cataract underwent phacoemulsification with three different types of IOL implantation. Biometry data were obtained by IOL master 700 (SS-OCT) and IOL power was calculated using Barrett Universal II formula. Two prediction formulae for ELP were compared, one with ACD + ½ LT and other with ACD alone; furthermore, comparison was done among three types of IOL. Mean prediction error was calculated for both methods and among three IOL groups. Results: In the study, predicted ELP according to ACD + ½ LT was 5.27 ± 0.27 and Mean pre-op ACD was 3.069 ± 0.349 mm, achieved ELP (post-op ACD) was 4.98 ± 0.47 mm and between the two; ACD + ½ LT is closer to achieved ELP. The difference between mean ACD + ½ LT (5.22) and achieved ELP (4.71) was 0.50 in ALCON ACRYSOF IQ (SN60WF) and difference of ACD + ½ LT (5.33) and achieved ELP (5.07) was 0.25 in J and J TECNIS 1 (ZCB00), while the difference of ACD + ½ LT (5.28) and achieved ELP (5.16) was 0.114 in ZEISS CT LUCIA (611P). Residual refraction predicted by IOL master 700 and achieved residual refraction at post-op 1 month was −0.15 ± 0.19 and −0.10 ± 0.30 in ACRYSOF IQ, was −0.11 ± 0.18 and −0.01 ± 0.20 in TECNIS 1 and was −0.10 ± 0.20 and + 0.396 ± 0.22 in ZEISS CT LUCIA, respectively. Conclusion: ELP may be better predicted by formulae ACD + ½ LT than ACD alone with mean differences of 0.29 and 1.92 in two prediction groups, respectively. ALCON ACRYSOF IQ (SN60WF) and J and J TECNIS 1 (ZCB00) group had myopic shifts of 0.10 and 0.11, respectively, while ZEISS CT LUCIA (611P) group had hyperopic shifts of 0.5002 which was statistically significant, as ALCON ACRYSOF IQ (SN60WF) and J and J TECNIS 1 (ZCB00) ELP is positioned more anterior and ZEISS CT LUCIA (611P) relatively posterior.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3