Author:
Chaturvedi Vishnu,Ramani Rama,Andes David,Diekema Daniel J.,Pfaller Michael A.,Ghannoum Mahmoud A.,Knapp Cindy,Lockhart Shawn R.,Ostrosky-Zeichner Luis,Walsh Thomas J.,Marchillo Karen,Messer Shawn,Welshenbaugh Amanda R.,Bastulli Cara,Iqbal Noreen,Paetznick Victor L.,Rodriguez Jose,Sein Tin
Abstract
ABSTRACTThere are few multilaboratory studies of antifungal combination testing to suggest a format for use in clinical laboratories. In the present study, eight laboratories tested quality control (QC) strainCandida parapsilosisATCC 22019 and clinical isolatesCandida albicans20533.043,C. albicans20464.007,Candida glabrata20205.075, andC. parapsilosis20580.070. The clinical isolates had relatively high azole and echinocandin MICs. A modified CLSI M27-A3 protocol was used, with 96-well custom-made plates containing checkerboard pairwise combinations of amphotericin B (AMB), anidulafungin (AND), caspofungin (CSP), micafungin (MCF), posaconazole (PSC), and voriconazole (VRC). The endpoints were scored visually and on a spectrophotometer or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader for 50% growth reduction (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50]). Combination IC50s were used to calculate summation fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICIs) (ΣFIC) based on the Lowe additivity formula. The results revealed that the IC50s of all drug combinations were lower or equal to the IC50of individual drugs in the combination. A majority of the ΣFIC values were indifferent (ΣFIC = 0.51 to 2.0), but no antagonism was observed (ΣFIC ≥ 4). Synergistic combinations (ΣFIC ≤ 0.5) were found for AMB-PSC againstC. glabrataand for AMB-AND and AMB-CSP againstC. parapsilosisby both visual and spectrophotometric readings. Additional synergistic interactions were revealed by either of the two endpoints for AMB-AND, AMB-CSP, AMB-MCF, AMB-PSC, AMB-VRC, AND-PSC, CSP-MCF, and CSP-PSC. The percent agreements among participating laboratories ranged from 37.5% (lowest) for AND-CSP and POS-VOR to 87.5% (highest) for AMB-MCF and AND-CSP. Median ΣFIC values showed a wide dispersion, and interlaboratory agreements were less than 85% in most instances. Additional studies are needed to improve the interlaboratory reproducibility of antifungal combination testing.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Reference50 articles.
1. Almyroudis, N. G., and B. H. Segal. 2009. Prevention and treatment of invasive fungal diseases in neutropenic patients. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 22:385-393.
2. Andes, D. 2003. Clinical pharmacodynamics of antifungals. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 17:635-649.
3. Anonymous. 1992. Synergism testing: broth microdilution checkerboard and broth macrodilution methods, p. 5.18.1-5.18.28. In H. D. Isenberg (ed.), Clinical microbiology procedures handbook. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
4. Antachopoulos, C., et al. 2005. Fungemia due to Trichosporon asahii in a neutropenic child refractory to amphotericin B: clearance with voriconazole. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 27:283-285.
5. Antachopoulos, C., and T. J. Walsh. 2005. New agents for invasive mycoses in children. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 17:78-87.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献