Author:
De Cesare Alessandra,Krishnamani Keshav,Parisi Antonio,Ricci Antonia,Luzzi Ida,Barco Lisa,Lucchi Alex,Miccolupo Angela,Manfreda Gerardo
Abstract
A quantitative comparison between discriminatory indexes and concordance among multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), automated ribotyping, and phage typing has been performed, testing 238Salmonella entericaserotype Enteritidis isolates not epidemiologically correlated. The results show that MLVA is the best choice, but each typing method provides a piece of information for establishing clonal relationships between the isolates.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference19 articles.
1. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2013;European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control;EFSA J,2015
2. Standardisation of multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) for subtyping of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis;Euro Surveill,2011
3. Standardization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for the subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella for PulseNet;Foodborne Pathog Dis,2006
4. Automated system rapidly identifies and characterizes micro-organisms in foods;Food Technol,1996
5. Reproducibility and indices of discriminatory of discriminatory power of microbial typing methods;J Clin Microbiol,1990
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献