Comparative performance of the Platelia Aspergillus Antigen and Aspergillus Galactomannan antigen Virclia Monotest immunoassays in serum and lower respiratory tract specimens: a “real-life” experience

Author:

Albert Eliseo1ORCID,Alcaraz María Jesús1,Giménez Estela1,Clari María Ángeles1,Torres Ignacio1,Colomina Javier1,Olea Beatriz1,Tormo Mar2,Piñana José Luis2,Oltra Rosa3,Signes-Costa Jaime4,Carbonell Nieves5ORCID,Solano Carlos26,Navarro David178ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Microbiology Service, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain

2. Hematology Service, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain

3. Infectious Diseases Unit, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain

4. Pulmonary Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain

5. Medical Intensive Care Unit, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain

6. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

7. Department of Microbiology School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

8. CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Platelia Aspergillus Antigen immunoassay is the “gold standard” for Aspergillus galactomannan (GLM) measurement in sera and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). We evaluated the performance of the Aspergillus GLM antigen Virclia Monotest compared to the Platelia assay. A total of 535 specimens [320 sera, 86 bronchial aspirates (BAs), 70 BAL, and 59 tracheal aspirates (TAs)] from 177 adult patients (72 hematological, 32 Intensive Care Unit, and 73 hospitalized in other wards) were processed for GLM testing upon clinical request. One patient had proven IPA, and 11 had probable disease. After excluding indeterminate Virclia results ( n = 38), 396 specimens yielded concordant results (56 positive and 340 negative) and 101 discordant results (Virclia positive/Platelia negative, n = 95). The overall agreement between immunoassays was higher for sera ( κ 0.56) than for BAL ( κ ≤ 0.24) or BAS and TA ( κ ≤ 0.22). When considering all specimen types in combination, the overall sensitivity and specificity of the Virclia assay for the diagnosis of proven/probable IPA were 100% and 65%, respectively, and for the Platelia immunoassay, sensitivity and specificity were 91.7% and 89.4%, respectively. The correlation between index values by both immunoassays was strong for serum/BAL ( ρ = 0.73; P < 0.001) and moderate for BAS/TA (Rho = 0.52; P = 0.001). The conversion of Virclia index values into the Platelia index could be derived by the formula y = (11.97 * X )/3.62 + X ). Data from GLM-positive serum/BAL clinical specimens fitted the regression model optimally ( R 2 = 0.94), whereas that of BAS and TA data did not ( R 2 = 0.11). Further studies are needed to determine whether the Virclia assay may be an alternative to the Platelia assay for GLM measurement in sera and lower respiratory tract specimens. IMPORTANCE Galactomannan detection in serum or bronchoalveolar fluid specimens is pivotal for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). The Platelia Aspergillus Antigen immunoassay has become the “gold standard” for Aspergillus GLM measurement. Here, we provide data suggesting that the Virclia Monotest assay, which displays several operational advantages compared with the Platelia assay, may become an alternative to the Platelia assay, although further studies are needed to validate this assumption. We also provide a formula allowing the conversion of Virclia index values into Platelia values. The study may contribute toward positioning the Virclia assay within the diagnostic algorithm of IPA.

Funder

MEC | Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3