In vitro comparison of methods for sampling copper-based antimicrobial surfaces

Author:

Williams T. C.1ORCID,Woznow T.1,Velapatino B.1ORCID,Asselin E.2ORCID,Nakhaie D.2ORCID,Bryce E. A.1,Charles M.13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Vancouver Coastal Health , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

2. Department of Materials Engineering, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

ABSTRACT For more than a decade, copper (Cu) and Cu alloy surfaces have been approved and registered as solid antimicrobials to reduce the environmental bioburden of potential pathogens. Bacterial collection and enumeration are important steps in assessing antimicrobial efficacy of these surfaces, yet comparisons of the different collection methods from Cu surfaces are scarce in the literature. This study compared Petrifilm (PF) aerobic count plates applied directly onto Cu surfaces and two indirect (cellulose sponges and Quick Swab) collection methods to evaluate bacterial recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus from three different formulations of Cu surfaces. ATP bioluminescence (ATPB) and live-dead flow cytometry staining were performed in tandem to corroborate bacterial recovery and antimicrobial findings. While all three collection methods were able to recover bacteria, direct PF contact with Cu surface consistently exhibited 2–3 Log higher colony-forming units (CFU)/20-cm 2 counts. No significant difference in bacterial counts was found when sponges or swabs were applied to Cu surfaces and inoculated onto 5% sheep blood agar plates (BAP). No difference was observed between PF and BAP counts when PF was used for recovery after indirect sample collection using Quick Swab. Comparison of microbial counts with live-dead staining and ATPB results suggests that the PF direct collection method revived stressed and dying bacteria. This phenomenon was not observed with the indirect PF method. Direct sampling of Cu surfaces using PF confers a survival advantage to bacteria stressed by Cu and may induce higher bacterial counts. IMPORTANCE Self-sanitizing surfaces such as copper (Cu) are increasingly used on high-touch surfaces to prevent the spread of harmful viruses and bacteria. Being able to monitor the antimicrobial properties of Cu is fundamental in measuring its antimicrobial efficacy. Thorough investigations into reliable methods to enumerate bacteria from self-sanitizing surfaces are lacking in the literature. This study demonstrates that direct use of Petrifilm on Cu surfaces most likely revives stressed and dying bacteria, which induces increased bacterial counts. This phenomenon was not observed with indirect collection methods. Studies assessing time-kill kinetics or long-term efficacy of Cu should consider the impact of the collection method chosen.

Funder

Teck Resources Limited

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Cell Biology,Microbiology (medical),Genetics,General Immunology and Microbiology,Ecology,Physiology

Reference30 articles.

1. Copper as an antimicrobial agent: recent advances

2. Copper Alloy Touch Surfaces in Healthcare Facilities: An Effective Solution to Prevent Bacterial Spreading

3. EPA . 2016. Protocol for the evaluation of bactericidal activity of hard non-porous copper containing surface products on Environmental Protection Agency. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/updated-draft-protocol-evaluation-bactericidal-activity-hard-non-porous. Retrieved 27 Sep 2016.

4. Environmental sampling of hospital surfaces: assessing methodological quality;Chai J;Can J Infect Control,2013

5. New insights on antimicrobial efficacy of copper surfaces in the healthcare environment: a systematic review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3