A prospective randomized clinical trial to assess antibiotic pocket irrigation on tissue expander breast reconstruction

Author:

Walker Jennifer N.12ORCID,Hanson Blake M.234ORCID,Hunter Tayler1,Simar Shelby R.234,Duran Ramirez Jesus M.1ORCID,Obernuefemann Chloe L. P.56,Parikh Rajiv P.7,Tenenbaum Marissa M.7,Margenthaler Julie A.8,Hultgren Scott J.56,Myckatyn Terence M.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Sciences Center , Houston, Texas, USA

2. Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences, Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Sciences Center , Houston, Texas, USA

3. Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Sciences Center , Houston, Texas, USA

4. Center for Antimicrobial Resistance and Microbial Genomics, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Sciences Center , Houston, Texas, USA

5. Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine , Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

6. Center for Women’s Infectious Disease Research, Washington University School of Medicine , Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

7. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine , Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

8. Division of Surgical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine , Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bacterial infection is the most common complication following staged post-mastectomy breast reconstruction initiated with a tissue expander (TE). To limit bacterial infection, antibiotic irrigation of the surgical site is commonly performed despite little high-quality data to support this practice. We performed a prospective randomized control trial to compare the impact of saline irrigation alone to a triple antibiotic irrigation regimen (1 g cefazolin, 80 mg gentamicin, and 50,000 units of bacitracin in 500 mL of saline) for breast implant surgery. The microbiome in breasts with cancer ( n = 16) was compared to those without ( n = 16), as all patients ( n = 16) had unilateral cancers but bilateral mastectomies ( n = 32). Biologic and prosthetic specimens procured both at the time of mastectomy and during TE removal months later were analyzed for longitudinal comparison. Outcomes included clinical infection, bacterial abundance, and relative microbiome composition. No patient in either group suffered a reconstructive failure or developed an infection. Triple antibiotic irrigation administered at the time of immediate TE reconstruction did not reduce bacterial abundance or impact microbial diversity relative to saline irrigation at the time of planned exchange. Implanted prosthetic material adopted the microbial composition of the surrounding host tissue. In cancer-naïve breasts, relative to saline, antibiotic irrigation increased bacterial abundance on periprosthetic capsules ( P = 0.03) and acellular dermal matrices ( P = 0.04) and altered the microbiota on both. These data show that, relative to saline only, the use of triple antibiotic irrigation in TE breast reconstruction does impact the bacterial abundance and diversity of certain biomaterials from cancer-naïve breasts. IMPORTANCE The lifetime risk of breast cancer is ~13% in women and is treated with a mastectomy in ~50% of cases. The majority are reconstructed, usually starting with a tissue expander to help restore the volume for a subsequent permanent breast implant or the women’s own tissues. The biopsychosocial benefits of breast reconstruction, though, can be tempered by a high complication rate of at least 7% but over 30% in some women. Bacterial infection is the most common complication, and can lead to treatment delays, patient physical and emotional distress and escalating health care cost. To limit this risk, plastic surgeons have tried a variety of strategies to limit bacterial infection including irrigating the pocket created after removing the breast implant with antibiotic solutions, but good-quality data are scarce. Herein, we study the value of antibiotics in pocket irrigation using a robust randomized clinical trial design and molecular microbiology approaches.

Funder

Plastic Surgery Foundation

HHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Cell Biology,Microbiology (medical),Genetics,General Immunology and Microbiology,Ecology,Physiology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Management of Biofilm with Breast Implant Surgery;Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery;2023-10-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3