Affiliation:
1. South Australian Water Corporation, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Escherichia coli
is excreted in high numbers from the intestinal tract of humans, other mammals, and birds. Traditionally, it had been thought that
E. coli
could grow only within human or animal hosts and would perish in the environment. Therefore, the presence of
E. coli
in water has become universally accepted as a key water quality indicator of fecal pollution. However, recent research challenges the assumption that the presence of
E. coli
in water is always an indicator of fecal contamination, with some types of
E. coli
having evolved to survive and grow in aquatic environments. These strains can form blooms in water storages, resulting in high
E. coli
counts even without fecal contamination. Although these bloom-forming strains lack virulence genes and pose little threat to public health, their presence in treated water triggers the same response as fecal-derived
E. coli
. Yet, little is known about the effectiveness of treatment processes in removing or inactivating them. This study evaluated the effectiveness of current treatment processes to remove bloom-forming strains, in comparison to fecal-derived strains, with conventional coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation and filtration investigated. Second, the effectiveness of current disinfection processes—chlorination, chloramination, and ultraviolet (UV) light to disinfect bloom-forming strains in comparison to fecal-derived strains—was assessed. These experiments showed that the responses of bloom isolates were not significantly different from those of fecal
E. coli
strains. Therefore, commonly used water treatment and disinfection processes are effective to remove bloom-forming
E. coli
strains from water.
IMPORTANCE
The presence of
Escherichia coli
in water has long been used globally as a key indicator of fecal pollution and for quantifying water safety. Traditionally, it was believed that
E. coli
could only thrive within hosts and would perish outside, making its presence in water indicative of fecal contamination. However, recent research has unveiled strains of
E. coli
capable of surviving and proliferating in aquatic environments, forming blooms even in the absence of fecal contamination. While these bloom-forming strains lack the genes to be pathogenic, their detection in source or drinking water triggers the same response as fecal-derived
E. coli
. Yet, little is known about the efficacy of treatment processes in removing them. This study evaluated the effectiveness of conventional treatment and disinfection processes in removing bloom-forming strains compared to fecal-derived strains. Results indicate that these commonly used processes are equally effective against both types of
E. coli
, reassuring that bloom-forming
E. coli
strains can be eliminated from water.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference67 articles.
1. Advances in the Bacteriology of the Coliform Group: Their Suitability as Markers of Microbial Water Safety
2. The utility of Escherichia coli as a contamination indicator for rural drinking water: Evidence from whole genome sequencing
3. Division USEPAOoWMMS, Transfer NRMRLT, Division S. 2004. Guidelines for water reuse. US Environmental Protection Agency.
4. WHO. 2017. Guidelines for drinking water quality 4th edition incorporating the first addendum, p 224–226. In Acceptability aspects: taste, odour and appearance. Geneva.
5. NHMRC N. 2011. Australian drinking water guidelines paper 6 national water quality management strategy, p 5–7. In National health and medical research council, national resource management ministerial council. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.