Exploring synergistic and antagonistic interactions in phage-antibiotic combinations against ESKAPE pathogens

Author:

Kunz Coyne Ashlan J.1ORCID,Eshaya Mirna1,Bleick Callan1ORCID,Vader Samantha1,Biswas Biswajit2,Wilson Melanie23,Deschenes Michael V.23,Alexander Jose4,Lehman Susan M.5ORCID,Rybak Michael J.167ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA

2. Naval Medical Research Center-Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland, USA

3. Leidos, Reston, Virginia, USA

4. Department of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology, AdventHealth Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA

5. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA

6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA

7. Department of Pharmacy, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the era of antimicrobial resistance, phage-antibiotic combinations offer a promising therapeutic option, yet research on their synergy and antagonism is limited. This study aims to assess these interactions, focusing on protein synthesis inhibitors and cell envelope-active agents against multidrug-resistant bacterial strains. We evaluated synergistic and antagonistic interactions in multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Enterococcus faecium , and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Phages were combined with protein synthesis inhibitors [linezolid (LZD), minocycline (MIN), gentamicin (GEN), and azithromycin (AZM)] or cell envelope-active agents [daptomycin (DAP), ceftaroline (CPT), and cefepime (FEP)]. Modified checkerboard minimum inhibitory concentration assays and 24-h time-kill analyses were conducted, alongside one-step growth curves to analyze phage growth kinetics. Statistical comparisons used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey test ( P < 0.05). In the checkerboard and 24-h time-kill analyses (TKA) of S. aureus and E. faecium , phage-LZD and phage-MIN combinations were antagonistic (FIC > 4) while phage-DAP and phage-CPT were synergistic (FIC 0.5) (ANOVA range of mean differences 0.52–2.59 log 10 CFU/mL; P < 0.001). For P. aeruginosa , phage-AZM was antagonistic (FIC > 4), phage-GEN was additive (FIC = 1), and phage-FEP was synergistic (ANOVA range of mean differences 1.04–1.95 log 10 CFU/mL; P < 0.001). Phage growth kinetics were altered in the presence of LZD and MIN against S. aureus and in the presence of LZD against a single E. faecium strain (HOU503). Our findings indicate that select protein synthesis inhibitors may induce phage-antibiotic antagonism. However, this antagonism may not solely stem from changes in phage growth kinetics, warranting further investigation into the complex interplay among strains, phage attributes, and antibiotic mechanisms affecting bacterial inhibition. IMPORTANCE In the face of escalating antimicrobial resistance, combining phages with antibiotics offers a promising avenue for treating infections unresponsive to traditional antibiotics. However, while studies have explored synergistic interactions, less attention has been given to potential antagonism and its impact on phage growth kinetics. This research evaluates the interplay between phages and antibiotics, revealing both synergistic and antagonistic patterns across various bacterial strains and shedding light on the complex dynamics that influence treatment efficacy. Understanding these interactions is crucial for optimizing combination therapies and advancing phage therapy as a viable solution for combating antimicrobial resistance.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Reference43 articles.

1. Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance: The Most Critical Pathogens

2. O’Neil J. 2016. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations, p 84. In Ro A, Ro A (ed), Resistance. Vol. 1. London, United kingdom.

3. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019 Centers for disease control and prevention: antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta GA. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threatsreport/2019-ar-threats-report-508.pdf

5. Bacteriophage Therapeutics: A Primer for Clinicians on Phage‐Antibiotic Combinations

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3