Clinical Evaluation of Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae

Author:

Suzuki Satowa1,Yamazaki Tsutomu2,Narita Mitsuo3,Okazaki Norio4,Suzuki Isao5,Andoh Tomoaki5,Matsuoka Mayumi1,Kenri Tsuyoshi1,Arakawa Yoshichika1,Sasaki Tsuguo1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Infection Control, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo

2. Department of Pediatrics, Saitama Medical School, Saitama

3. Sapporo Tetsudo Hospital, Hokkaido

4. Kanagawa Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Kanagawa

5. Department of Pediatrics, Chigasaki Municipal Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan

Abstract

ABSTRACT Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MR M. pneumoniae ) has been isolated from clinical specimens in Japan since 2000. A comparative study was carried out to determine whether or not macrolides are effective in treating patients infected with MR M. pneumoniae . The clinical courses of 11 patients with MR M. pneumoniae infection (MR patients) treated with macrolides were compared with those of 26 patients with macrolide-susceptible M. pneumoniae infection (MS patients). The total febrile days and the number of febrile days during macrolide administration were longer in the MR patients than in the MS patients (median of 8 days versus median of 5 days [ P = 0.019] and 3 days versus 1 day [ P = 0.002], respectively). In addition, the MR patients were more likely than the MS patients to have had a change of the initially prescribed macrolide to another antimicrobial agent (63.6% versus 3.8%; odds ratio, 43.8; P < 0.001), which might reflect the pediatrician's judgment that the initially prescribed macrolide was not sufficiently effective in these patients. Despite the fact that the febrile period was prolonged in MR patients given macrolides, the fever resolved even when the initial prescription was not changed. These results show that macrolides are certainly less effective in MR patients.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3