Affiliation:
1. Food Safety and Enteric Pathogens, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa, USA
2. Genomics Research Units, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Antibiotics are a cost-effective tool for improving feed efficiency and preventing disease in agricultural animals, but the full scope of their collateral effects is not understood. Antibiotics have been shown to mediate gene transfer by inducing prophages in certain bacterial strains; therefore, one collateral effect could be prophage induction in the gut microbiome at large. Here we used metagenomics to evaluate the effect of two antibiotics in feed (carbadox and ASP250 [chlortetracycline, sulfamethazine, and penicillin]) on swine intestinal phage metagenomes (viromes). We also monitored the bacterial communities using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. ASP250, but not carbadox, caused significant population shifts in both the phage and bacterial communities. Antibiotic resistance genes, such as multidrug resistance efflux pumps, were identified in the viromes, but in-feed antibiotics caused no significant changes in their abundance. The abundance of phage integrase-encoding genes was significantly increased in the viromes of medicated swine over that in the viromes of nonmedicated swine, demonstrating the induction of prophages with antibiotic treatment. Phage-bacterium population dynamics were also examined. We observed a decrease in the relative abundance of
Streptococcus
bacteria (prey) when
Streptococcus
phages (predators) were abundant, supporting the “kill-the-winner” ecological model of population dynamics in the swine fecal microbiome. The data show that gut ecosystem dynamics are influenced by phages and that prophage induction is a collateral effect of in-feed antibiotics.
IMPORTANCE
This study advances our knowledge of the collateral effects of in-feed antibiotics at a time in which the widespread use of “growth-promoting” antibiotics in agriculture is under scrutiny. Using comparative metagenomics, we show that prophages are induced by in-feed antibiotics in swine fecal microbiomes and that antibiotic resistance genes were detected in most viromes. This suggests that in-feed antibiotics are contributing to phage-mediated gene transfer, potentially of antibiotic resistance genes, in the swine gut. Additionally, the so-called “kill-the-winner” model of phage-bacterium population dynamics has been shown in aquatic ecosystems but met with conflicting evidence in gut ecosystems. The data support the idea that swine fecal
Streptococcus
bacteria and their phages follow the kill-the-winner model. Understanding the role of phages in gut microbial ecology is an essential component of the antibiotic resistance problem and of developing potential mitigation strategies.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference53 articles.
1. Infectious Diseases Society of America . 14 July 2010. The Infectious Diseases Society of America’s (IDSDA) statement on antibiotic resistance: promoting judicious use of medically important antibiotics in animal agriculture. Testimony before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health. House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Washington, DC. http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/documents/20100714/Johnson.Testimony.07.14.2010.pdf.
2. Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services . 2010. The judicious use of medically important antimicrobial drugs in food-producing animals. Draft guidance no. 209. Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD.
3. Effect of Abolishment of the Use of Antimicrobial Agents for Growth Promotion on Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Enterococci from Food Animals in Denmark
4. US Government Accountability Office . 2011. Antibiotic resistance: agencies have made limited progress addressing antibiotic use in animals. Report no. GAO-11-801. US Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.
5. WHY AND HOW ANTIBIOTICS ARE USED IN SWINE PRODUCTION
Cited by
190 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献