Improved Performance of a Rapid Office-Based Stool Test for Detection of Helicobacter pylori in Children before and after Therapy

Author:

Prell C.1,Osterrieder S.1,Lottspeich C.2,Schwarzer A.1,Rüssmann H.3,Ossiander G.1,Koletzko S.1

Affiliation:

1. Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Lindwurmstraße 4, 80337 Munich, Germany

2. Max von Pettenkofer Institute for Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Pettenkoferstraße 9a, 80336 Munich, Germany

3. HELIOS Klinikum Emil von Behring, Institute for Microbiology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, Walterhöferstraße 11, 14165 Berlin, Germany

Abstract

ABSTRACT A modified version of a rapid office based one-step monoclonal immunoassay for detection of Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool samples from children was evaluated against biopsy specimen-based methods and compared to a monoclonal enzyme immunoassay using the same antigen. Blinded stool samples from 185 children (0.3 to 18.2 years) were investigated at the time of upper endoscopy prior to anti- H. pylori therapy; 62 children were H. pylori infected and 123 noninfected according to predefined reference standards. Samples obtained 6 to 8 weeks after anti- H. pylori therapy were available from 58 children (3.8 to 17.7 years) and were compared to results of the [ 13 C]urea breath test (14/58 were positive). The rapid stool tests were performed by two independent readers. Of 243 rapid tests performed, 1 (0.4%) was invalid for technical reasons. Equivocal results (very weak line) were reported 16 times by reader 1 and 27 times by reader 2. When equivocal results were considered positive, the two observers agreed on 76 positive and 160 negative results and disagreed on 7 samples (2.9%). The sensitivity was 90.8% for reader 1 and 85.5% for reader 2, and the specificity was 91.0% and 93.4%, respectively. The monoclonal enzyme immunoassay revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 94.7% and 97.6%, respectively. The modified chromatographic immunoassay is a good alternative in settings or situations when the monoclonal enzyme immunoassay or the [ 13 C]urea breath test are not available or feasible. In order to improve sensitivity, very weak lines should be considered positive test results.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3