Affiliation:
1. Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
Abstract
SUMMARY
Molecular technology has changed the way that clinical laboratories diagnose and manage many infectious diseases. Excellent sensitivity, specificity, and speed have made molecular assays an attractive alternative to culture or enzyme immunoassay methods. Many molecular assays are commercially available and FDA approved. Others, especially those that test for less common analytes, are often laboratory developed. Laboratories also often modify FDA-approved assays to include different extraction systems or additional specimen types. The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) federal regulatory standards require clinical laboratories to establish and document their own performance specifications for laboratory-developed tests to ensure accurate and precise results prior to implementation of the test. The performance characteristics that must be established include accuracy, precision, reportable range, reference interval, analytical sensitivity, and analytical specificity. Clinical laboratories are challenged to understand the requirements and determine the types of experiments and analyses necessary to meet the requirements. A variety of protocols and guidelines are available in various texts and documents. Many of the guidelines are general and more appropriate for assays in chemistry sections of the laboratory but are applied in principle to molecular assays. This review presents information that laboratories may consider in their efforts to meet regulatory requirements.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Immunology and Microbiology,Epidemiology
Reference82 articles.
1. Antwerpen, M. H., P. Zimmermann, K. Bewley, D. Frangoulidis, and H. Meyer. 2008. Real-time PCR system targeting a chromosomal marker specific for Bacillus anthracis. Mol. Cell Probes22:313-315.
2. Ballagi-Pordany, A., and S. Belak. 1996. The use of mimics as internal standards to avoid false negatives in diagnostic PCR. Mol. Cell Probes10:159-164.
3. Bland, J. M., and D. G. Altman. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lanceti:307-310.
4. Bolotin, S., C. De Lima, K. W. Choi, E. Lombos, L. Burton, T. Mazzulli, and S. J. Drews. 2009. Validation of the TaqMan Influenza A Detection Kit and a rapid automated total nucleic acid extraction method to detect influenza A virus in nasopharyngeal specimens. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci.39:155-159.
5. Cai, T., G. Lou, J. Yang, D. Xu, and Z. Meng. 2008. Development and evaluation of real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification for hepatitis B virus DNA quantification: a new tool for HBV management. J. Clin. Virol.41:270-276.
Cited by
415 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献