Controlled clinical comparison of Isolator and BACTEC 9240 Aerobic/F resin bottle for detection of bloodstream infections

Author:

Pohlman J K1,Kirkley B A1,Easley K A1,Washington J A1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195-5140, USA.

Abstract

A controlled clinical comparison was carried out with the BACTEC 9240 Aerobic/F resin bottle and the Isolator system with adult patients suspected of having bloodstream infections. A total of 10,500 paired specimens were collected, of which 1,122 from 520 patients were positive. There were 68 false-positive BACTEC bottles; 259 positive cultures that were excluded from analysis because the bottle, the Isolator, or both failed to meet the minimum volume criterion of 8 ml of blood; and 207 positive cultures that were excluded because the isolates were found to be clinically insignificant or of indeterminate clinical significance on the basis of patient assessment. A total of 656 positive cultures from 258 patients formed the basis of the analysis. Significantly more Staphylococcus aureus isolates (P = 0.03), Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates (P = 0.03), members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (P = 0.03), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (P = 0.04) were recovered from the resin bottle, and there was no category of organism that was recovered significantly more frequently from the Isolator system. With patients receiving antibiotics at the time of blood culture, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and gram-negative bacilli were recovered significantly more frequently from the resin bottle. No significant differences between systems were found with cultures from patients not receiving antibiotics at the time of blood culture. Only 12 clinically significant organisms were recovered from the bottle on terminal subcultures, and only 1 of these had not been previously isolated from another blood culture set (10 of the 12) or from the companion Isolator (1 of 12). The Aerobic/F resin bottle continuously monitored in the BACTEC 9240 instrument proved to be superior to the Isolator in overall yield of organisms causing bloodstream infection in adults and required less technician time for specimen processing and examination than the Isolator system.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

Reference13 articles.

1. Auckenthaler R. and J. Pougnier. 1984. Comparison of DuPont Isolator versus Roche SeptiChek blood culture system for the detection of bacteremia during antimicrobial therapy abstr. C8 p. 238. In Abstracts of the 84th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 1984. American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C.

2. Comparison of Iysis-centrifugation and radiometric resin systems for blood culture;Brannon P.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1986

3. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988;Garner J. S.;Am. J. Infect. Control,1988

4. Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the Isolator Iysis-centrifugation blood culture tube;Henry N. K.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1983

5. Ilstrup D. M. 1978. Statistical methods employed in the study of blood culture media p. 31-39. In J. A. Washington II (ed.) The detection of septicemia. CRC Press West Palm Beach Fla.

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3