Comparison of rapid urease tests, staining techniques, and growth on different solid media for detection of Campylobacter pylori

Author:

Coudron P E1,Kirby D F1

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory Service, McGuire Veterans Administration Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia 23249.

Abstract

Thirty-nine single antral biopsies (phase 1) and 99 sets of six antral biopsies (phase 2) were collected from 132 patients, and 87 (63%) yielded positive cultures for Campylobacter pylori. Of several primary media tested in phase 1, tryptic soy agar and Skirrow agar, each supplemented with 10% whole sheep blood, supported relatively good growth of C. pylori. In phase 2, four of the six biopsies in each set were tested with different urease systems. Selective urea agar for rapid identification was the most sensitive (39 of 63 [62%] at 1 h) and specific (100%); however, the difference between this system and the CLOtest was not statistically significant. The remaining two biopsies, one transported in saline and the other transported in a supplemented tryptic soy broth, were ground separately and inoculated onto tryptic soy agar and Skirrow agar, each supplemented with 10% whole sheep blood. In selected instances, 10% horse serum or 10% horse serum and 5 mM urea or 1% cholesterol were also added to the media. Smears stained with a modified Gram stain or acridine orange detected 68% of 63 culture-positive biopsies; no false-positive results were reported. Skirrow agar supported better growth of C. pylori than did tryptic soy agar; the nonselective medium was also overgrown with contaminants in 25 to 30% of the positive cultures. Based on colony size, Skirrow agar supplemented with 10% whole sheep blood, 10% horse serum, and 1% cholesterol supported optimal growth of C. pylori. Fresh media supported better growth than did prepoured commercial media (P less than or equal to 0.004). Saline was a convenient and satisfactory transport medium for antral biopsies.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3