Suppression of Intrinsic Resistance to Methicillin and Other Penicillins in Staphylococcus aureus

Author:

Sabath L. D.1,Wallace Steven J.1,Gerstein Deborah A.1

Affiliation:

1. Channing Laboratory and Thorndike Memorial Laboratory, Harvard Medical Unit, Boston City Hospital, and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02118

Abstract

The p H of the medium in which staphylococcal susceptibility to penicillins was determined was found to make a profound difference (128- to 8,000-fold) in the expression of “intrinsic” resistance, whereas β-lactamase-mediated resistance was only slightly affected by p H; methicillin-resistant staphylococci that are β-lactamase-negative are models of pure intrinsic resistance, and the common β-lactamase-producing organisms (methicillin-susceptible) are examples of pure β-lactamase-mediated resistance. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci were unable to express their resistance at p H 5.2. However, growth of methicillin-resistant organisms in acid ( p H 5.2) medium, followed by susceptibility testing at p H 7.4, showed no elimination of the genotype for intrinsic resistance, indicating that the p H effect was due to suppression, rather than to elimination of the gene determining the intrinsic resistance. These p H changes had little effect on the susceptibility of staphylococci that possessed neither intrinsic resistance nor β-lactamase-mediated resistance. Thus, the suppression of “intrinsic” resistance was highly specific, and probably not the result of a change in ionization of the antibiotic, which would have been expected to affect all cells essentially equally. It is unlikely that foci of inflammation in man become sufficiently acid to suppress methicillin resistance of the staphylococci causing infection and inflammation.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Reference17 articles.

1. Effect of pH of medium on activity of streptomycin and penicillin and other chemotherapeutic substances;Abraham E. D.;Lancet,1946

2. Albert A. 1965. Selective toxicity p. 178-221. Methuen London.

3. The effect of temperature on resistance of staphylococcus aureus to methicillin and some other antibiotics;Annear D. I.;Med. J. Aust.,1968

4. Barber M. 1962. Coagulase-positive staphylococci resistant to benzyl penicillin methicillin and other penicillins p. 89-104. In A. V. S. de Reuck and M. P. Cameron (ed.) Resistance of bacteria to the penicillins. Little Brown & Co. Boston.

5. Penicilinase production and intrinsic resistance to penicillins in staphylococcus aureus;Dyke K. G.;Lancet,1966

Cited by 46 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3