Affiliation:
1. Division of Adolescent Medicine
2. Division of Epidemiology
3. Division of Pathology
4. Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to examine the effects of clinical factors and of the type and timing of a secondary test in improving the sensitivity of
Trichomonas vaginalis
detection in young women over that of a wet mount alone. For this purpose, sexually active adolescent women (
n
= 345) were recruited from a hospital teen clinic or emergency department. Following an interview and a pelvic exam, four primary
T. vaginalis
tests (wet mount, culture, a rapid test, and a nucleic acid amplification test [NAAT]) were performed on vaginal swabs. If the wet-mount result was negative, two secondary tests (culture and a rapid test) were performed on the used wet-mount swab and saline. A positive result by any of the four primary tests was considered a true
T. vaginalis
-positive result. The prevalence of
T. vaginalis
was 18.8% overall and 8.8% in the 307 wet-mount-negative women. There was 100% concordance between primary and secondary rapid tests. Secondary culture was 80% sensitive compared to primary culture. The likelihood of a positive rapid test increased with increasing time between specimen collection and testing. A wet mount followed by a rapid test was the most sensitive strategy using two tests (86.4%; confidence interval [CI], 75.3 to 93.4%). Limiting secondary testing to those with multiple partners resulted in a lower sensitivity (73.9%; CI, 61.5 to 84%) that was not significantly better than that of the wet mount alone (58.5%; CI, 45.6 to 70.6%). We conclude that a rapid test can be delayed or performed on a used swab with no loss of sensitivity. Until a NAAT for
T. vaginalis
is commercially available, a stepwise approach using an additional rapid test for wet-mount-negative women is recommended for adolescent women regardless of clinical factors.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference16 articles.
1. Amsel, R., P. A. Totten, C. A. Spiegel, K. C. Chen, D. Eschenbach, and K. K. Holmes. 1983. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med.74:14-22.
2. Borchardt, K. A., M. Z. Zhang, H. Shing, and K. Flink. 1997. A comparison of the sensitivity of the InPouch TV, Diamond's and Trichosel media for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis. Genitourin. Med.73:297-298.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2006. Guidelines for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases: trichomoniasis. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.55:52-54.
4. Gottlieb, S. L., J. M. Douglas, Jr., M. Foster, et al. 2004. Incidence of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in 5 sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics and the effect of HIV/STD risk-reduction counseling. J. Infect. Dis.190:1059-1067.
5. Comparison between the Gen-Probe Transcription-Mediated Amplification
Trichomonas vaginalis
Research Assay and Real-Time PCR for
Trichomonas vaginalis
Detection Using a Roche LightCycler Instrument with Female Self-Obtained Vaginal Swab Samples and Male Urine Samples
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献