Affiliation:
1. University of Houston College of Pharmacy
2. University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
3. Ferris State University, Kalamazoo, Michigan
Abstract
ABSTRACT
We compared the in vitro pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole against
Aspergillus
,
Fusarium
, and
Scedosporium
species with a combination of two non-culture-based techniques: the tetrazolium salt 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-[(sulfenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium-hydroxide) (XTT) colorimetric reduction assay, and fluorescent microscopy with the cellular morbidity dye bis-(1,3-dibutylbarbituric acid) trimethine oxonol (DiBAC) to directly visualize hyphal damage. Amphotericin B exhibited species-specific concentration-dependent activity, with 50% effective concentrations (EC
50
s) ranging from 0.10 to 0.12 mg/ml for
A. fumigatus
, 0.36 to 0.53 mg/ml for
A. terreus
, 0.27 to ≥32 mg/ml for
F. solani
, 0.41 to 0.55 mg/ml for
F. oxysporum
, and 0.97 and 0.65 mg/ml for
S. apiospermum
and
S. prolificans
, respectively. Similarly, itraconazole inhibited the growth of
A. fumigatus
and
A. terreus
isolates with MICs of <1 mg/ml (EC
50
0.03 to 0.85 mg/ml) and
S. apiospermum
, but was not active against
Fusarium
species or
S. prolificans
. Voriconazole effectively inhibited the growth of
Aspergillus
,
Fusarium
, and
S. apiospermum
(EC
50
0.10 to 3.3 mg/ml) but had minimal activity against a multidrug-resistant isolate of
F. solani
or
S. prolificans
. Hyphal damage visualized by DiBAC staining was observed more frequently with voriconazole and amphotericin B versus itraconazole. These data highlight the species-specific differences in antifungal pharmacodynamics between mold-active agents that could be relevant for the development of in vitro susceptibility breakpoints and antifungal dosing in vivo.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Cited by
101 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献