Affiliation:
1. Institute of Medical Microbiology
2. Institute for Hygiene, University Hospital of Münster, Münster
3. DSMZ—German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany
Abstract
ABSTRACT
To establish an improved ribosomal gene sequence database as part of the Ribosomal Differentiation of Microorganisms (RIDOM) project and to overcome the drawbacks of phenotypic identification systems and publicly accessible sequence databases, both strands of the 5′ end of the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) of 81 type and reference strains comprising all validly described staphylococcal (sub)species were sequenced. Assuming a normal distribution for pairwise distances of all unique staphylococcal sequences and choosing a reporting criterion of ≥98.7% similarity for a “distinct species,” a statistical error probability of 1.0% was calculated. To evaluate this database, a 16S rDNA fragment (corresponding to
Escherichia coli
positions 54 to 510) of 55 clinical
Staphylococcus
isolates (including those of the small-colony variant phenotype) were sequenced and analyzed by the RIDOM approach. Of these isolates, 54 (98.2%) had a similarity score above the proposed threshold using RIDOM; 48 (87.3%) of the sequences gave a perfect match, whereas 83.6% were found by searching National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database entries. In contrast to RIDOM, which showed four ambiguities at the species level (mainly concerning
Staphylococcus intermedius
versus
Staphylococcus delphini
), the NCBI database search yielded 18 taxon-related ambiguities and showed numerous matches exhibiting redundant or unspecified entries. Comparing molecular results with those of biochemical procedures, ID 32 Staph (bioMérieux, Marcy I'Etoile, France) and VITEK 2 (bioMérieux) failed to identify 13 (23.6%) and 19 (34.5%) isolates, respectively, due to incorrect identification and/or categorization below acceptable values. In contrast to phenotypic methods and the NCBI database, the novel high-quality RIDOM sequence database provides excellent identification of staphylococci, including rarely isolated species and phenotypic variants.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference42 articles.
1. Allerberger, F., and S. J. Fritschel. 1999. Use of automated ribotyping of Austrian Listeria monocytogenes isolates to support epidemiological typing. J. Microbiol. Methods35:237-244.
2. Baird-Parker, A. C. 1963. A classification of micrococci and staphylococci based on physiological and chemical tests. J. Gen. Microbiol.30:409-427.
3. Baird-Parker, A. C. 1974. The basis for the present classification of staphylococci and micrococci. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.236:7-14.
4. Prevalence of Genes Encoding Pyrogenic Toxin Superantigens and Exfoliative Toxins among Strains of
Staphylococcus aureus
Isolated from Blood and Nasal Specimens
5. Becker, K., G. Haverkämper, C. von Eiff, R. Roth, and G. Peters. 2001. Survey of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes, exfoliative toxin genes, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 gene in non-Staphylococcus aureus species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.20:407-409.
Cited by
168 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献