Activities of Fosfomycin, Tigecycline, Colistin, and Gentamicin against Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in a Foreign-Body Infection Model

Abstract

ABSTRACTLimited antimicrobial agents are available for the treatment of implant-associated infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. We compared the activities of fosfomycin, tigecycline, colistin, and gentamicin (alone and in combination) against a CTX-M15-producing strain ofEscherichia coli(Bj HDE-1)in vitroand in a foreign-body infection model. The MIC and the minimal bactericidal concentration in logarithmic phase (MBClog) and stationary phase (MBCstat) were 0.12, 0.12, and 8 μg/ml for fosfomycin, 0.25, 32, and 32 μg/ml for tigecycline, 0.25, 0.5, and 2 μg/ml for colistin, and 2, 8, and 16 μg/ml for gentamicin, respectively. In time-kill studies, colistin showed concentration-dependent activity, but regrowth occurred after 24 h. Fosfomycin demonstrated rapid bactericidal activity at the MIC, and no regrowth occurred. Synergistic activity between fosfomycin and colistinin vitrowas observed, with no detectable bacterial counts after 6 h. In animal studies, fosfomycin reduced planktonic counts by 4 log10CFU/ml, whereas in combination with colistin, tigecycline, or gentamicin, it reduced counts by >6 log10CFU/ml. Fosfomycin was the only single agent which was able to eradicateE. colibiofilms (cure rate, 17% of implanted, infected cages). In combination, colistin plus tigecycline (50%) and fosfomycin plus gentamicin (42%) cured significantly more infected cages than colistin plus gentamicin (33%) or fosfomycin plus tigecycline (25%) (P< 0.05). The combination of fosfomycin plus colistin showed the highest cure rate (67%), which was significantly better than that of fosfomycin alone (P< 0.05). In conclusion, the combination of fosfomycin plus colistin is a promising treatment option for implant-associated infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.