Rapid Detection of Carbapenemase Production in Enterobacteriaceae by Use of a Modified Paper Strip Carba NP Method

Author:

Ho Pak-Leung1ORCID,Wang Ya1,Wing-Sze Tse Cindy2,Fung Kitty Sau-Chun3,Cheng Vincent Chi-Chung1,Lee Rodney4,To Wing-Kin5,Lai Raymond Wai-Man6,Luk Wei-Kwang7,Que Tak-Lun8,Tsang Dominic Ngai-Chong9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Microbiology and Carol Yu Centre for Infection, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

2. Department of Clinical Pathology, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

3. Department of Pathology, United Christian Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

4. Department of Clinical Pathology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

5. Department of Clinical Pathology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

6. Department of Microbiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

7. Department of Pathology, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

8. Department of Clinical Pathology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

9. Department of Clinical Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rapid and accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is important for preventing their spread in health care settings. We compared the performance of the Carba NP (CNP) test using the CLSI tube method with that using a modified paper strip method for the detection of carbapenemases in 390 Enterobacteriaceae isolates. The isolates were identified by Hong Kong's carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae surveillance program in 2016 and comprised 213 CPE and 177 carbapenemase-negative Enterobacteriaceae isolates. Molecular genotype was used as the reference. The test results were read at different time points for the CLSI method (1 min, 5 min, 1 h, and 2 h) and strip method (1 min and 5 min). The strip CNP and CLSI CNP tests correctly detect carbapenemase production in 93% and 93% of KPC producers, 100% and 38% of IMI producers, 94% and 85% of IMP producers, 98% and 90% of NDM producers, and 29% and 12% of OXA producers, respectively. Overall, the strip method has superior sensitivity to the CLSI method (86% versus 75%, respectively; P < 0.001, McNemar test). The specificity of both methods was 100%. By the CLSI method, 27%, 14%, 29%, and 6% of the CPE isolates were positive at 1 min, 5 min, 1 h, and 2 h, respectively. In contrast, by the strip method, 76% of the CPE isolates were positive at 1 min, and an additional 10% were positive at 5 min. In conclusion, the Carba NP test by use of the modified strip method has a higher sensitivity and a shorter assay time than that those by use of the CLSI tube method.

Funder

FHB | Health and Medical Research Fund

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3