Affiliation:
1. Departments of Internal Medicine
2. Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3. Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Limited data on the clinical outcome of vancomycin treatment compared with that of beta-lactam treatment in patients with methicillin-susceptible
Staphylococcus aureus
bacteremia (MSSA-B) are available. We used different and complementary approaches: (i) a retrospective cohort study using a propensity score to adjust for confounding by treatment assignment and (ii) a matched case-control study. Of all patients with
S. aureus
bacteremia (SAB) in two university-affiliated hospitals over a 7-year period, 294 patients with MSSA-B were enrolled in the cohort study. The cases for the case-control study were defined as patients who received vancomycin treatment for MSSA-B; the controls, who were patients that received beta-lactam treatment for MSSA-B, were selected at a 1:2 (case:control) ratio according to the objective matching scoring system and the propensity score system. In the cohort study, SAB-related mortality in patients with vancomycin treatment (37%, 10/27) was significantly higher than that in those with beta-lactam treatment (18%, 47/267) (
P
= 0.02). In addition, multivariate analysis revealed that vancomycin treatment was associated with SAB-related mortality when independent predictors for SAB-related mortality and propensity score were considered (adjusted odds ratio of 3.3, 95% confidence interval of 1.2 to 9.5). In the case-control study using the objective matching scoring system and the propensity score system, SAB-related mortality in case patients was 37% (10/27) and in control patients 11% (6/54) (
P
< 0.01). Our data suggest that vancomycin is inferior to beta-lactam in the treatment of MSSA-B.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Reference21 articles.
1. Apellaniz, G., M. Valdes, R. Perez, F. Martin, F. Soria, A. Garcia, J. Gomez, and T. Vicente. 1991. Comparison of the effectiveness of various antibiotics in the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus experimental infective endocarditis. J. Chemother.3:91-97.
2. Chambers, H. F. 1997. Parenteral antibiotics for the treatment of bacteremia and other serious staphylococcal infections, p. 583-601. In K. B. Crossley and G. L. Archer (ed.), The staphylococci in human disease. Churchill Livingstone, Inc., New York, NY.
3. Chang, F. Y. 2000. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect.33:63-68.
4. Chang, F. Y., J. E. Peacock, Jr., D. M. Musher, P. Triplett, B. B. MacDonald, J. M. Mylotte, A. O'Donnell, M. M. Wagener, and V. L. Yu. 2003. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: recurrence and the impact of antibiotic treatment in a prospective multicenter study. Medicine82:333-339.
5. Culver, D. H., T. C. Horan, R. P. Gaynes, W. J. Martone, W. R. Jarvis, T. G. Emori, S. N. Banerjee, J. R. Edwards, J. S. Tolson, and T. S. Henderson. 1991. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index: National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am. J. Med.91(Suppl. 3B):152S-157S.
Cited by
262 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献