Author:
Thornsberry C,Anhalt J P,Washington J A,McCarthy L R,Schoenknecht F D,Sherris J C,Spencer H J
Abstract
The MS-2 system (Abbott Diagnostics, Division of Abbott Laboratories, Dallas, Tex.) was evaluated for its efficacy in determining the susceptibilities of both clinical and selected challenge (nonfastidious, facultative, and aerobic) isolates. The MS-2 results were compared with standard Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and microdilution results by using fresh clinical isolates. For gram-positive isolates other than enterococci, overall agreement between MS-2 and reference results was 93 to 98%. With enterococci, MS-2 agreement with disk diffusion was 68% but with microdilution was 86% (agreement between disk diffusion and microdilution was 73%). The main discrepancies with enterococci were with cephalothin, penicillin, gentamicin, and kanamycin. With clinical gram-negative isolates, the overall agreement was 91 to 93%, with most discrepancies occurring with Enterobacter spp. and beta-lactam antibiotics (MS-2 versus disk diffusion, 84%; MS-2 versus microdilution, 84%; disk diffusion versus microdilution, 87%) and with Serratia spp. and colistin (false-susceptible results). The agreement of MS-2 results with established reference antibiograms of a special collection of challenge strains was 91 to 97% for the gram-positive cocci and 86 to 98% for the gram-negative strains. (With Enterobacter spp., agreement was 86%, but was greater than 90% for all other organism groups.) Of the 98 finite MS-2 minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) that could be directly compared with microdilution MICs, 77 (79%) were within +/- 1 well of the geometric mean microdilution MIC. MS-2 analysis time ranged from 2.8 to 6.5 h (mean, 4.2 h). On the basis of these results, we conclude that the MS-2 can be expected to yield rapid and accurate results with most nonfastidious, facultative, and aerobic pathogens.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference8 articles.
1. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method;Bauer A. W.;Am. J. Clin. Pathol.,1966
2. Prototype of a fully automated device for determination of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility in the clinical laboratory. Apple;Isenberg H. D.;Microbiol.,1971
3. In vitro response of Enterobacter to ampicillin;Lampe M. F.;Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother.,1979
4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 1975. Approved standard: ASM-2. Performance standards for antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Villanova Pa.
5. Spencer H. J. J. Stockert P. Welaj R. Wilborn and B. Price. 1976. Automated susceptibility testing with the MS-2 system. In H. H. Johnston and S. W. B. Newsom (ed.) The Second International Symposium on Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology. Learned Information Ltd. Oxford.
Cited by
77 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献