Could ceftriaxone be a viable alternative to penicillin for the treatment of ocular syphilis?

Author:

Gu Xin1ORCID,Lu Haikong1,Yang Yilan1,Zhu Lin1,Shi Mei1,Guan Zhifang1,Ni Liyan1,Peng Ruirui1,Zhao Wei1,Wu Juan1,Qi Tengfei1,Zhou Pingyu1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Sexually Transmitted Disease, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of ceftriaxone with that of aqueous crystalline penicillin G in treating ocular syphilis. We conducted a retrospective study from 2010 to 2021. Syphilis patients were administered either ceftriaxone (2 g intravenously daily for 14 days) or aqueous crystalline penicillin G [4 million units (MU) intravenously every 4 h for 14 days] as therapeutic interventions. Subsequently, we utilized these two groups to assess the serological results, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and visual acuity at time intervals spanning 3 to 6 months post-treatment. A total of 205 patients were included, with 34 assigned to the ceftriaxone group and 171 to the penicillin group. The median age of patients was 56 years, with an interquartile range of 49–62 years, and 137 of them (66.8%) were male. Between 3 and 6 months after treatment, 13 patients (38.2%) in the ceftriaxone group and 82 patients (48.0%) in the penicillin group demonstrated effective treatment based on the clinical and laboratory parameters. The crude odds ratio (OR) was 0.672 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.316–1.428, P = 0.301), indicating no significant difference in effectiveness between the two groups. Thirty patients (17.5%) in the penicillin group and six patients (17.6%) in the ceftriaxone group did not experience successful outcomes. Notably, no serious adverse effects were reported in both the groups. There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of ceftriaxone and aqueous crystalline penicillin G in treating ocular syphilis. The administration of ceftriaxone without requiring hospitalization presents a convenient and safe alternative treatment option for ocular syphilis.

Funder

MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China

Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Concerns about the interpretation of treatment effects;Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy;2024-08-07

2. Reply to Sumiyoshi, “Concerns about the interpretation of treatment effects”;Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy;2024-08-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3