Affiliation:
1. SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse
2. Laboratory Alliance of Central New York, Liverpool
3. Kaiser Permanente Regional Reference Laboratories, North Hollywood, California
4. Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Campylobacter
enteritis is a food-borne or waterborne illness caused almost exclusively by
Campylobacter jejuni
and, to a lesser extent, by
Campylobacter coli
. These organisms produce indistinguishable clinical diseases and together represent the second most common cause of bacterial diarrhea in the United States and the leading cause of enteric infection throughout the world. The conventional approach to the laboratory diagnosis of
Campylobacter
enteritis is based on the recovery of the organism from a stool specimen, which requires the use of a specialized medium incubated at 42°C for several days in an artificially created microaerophilic environment. Recently, several commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have been developed for the direct detection of
C. jejuni
and
C. coli
in stool specimens. This study compared conventional culture with three EIA methods, the Premier CAMPY EIA (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH), the ProSpecT Campylobacter EIA (Remel, Lenexa, KS), and the ImmunoCard STAT! CAMPY test (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH), for the detection of
C. jejuni
and
C. coli
in 485 patient stool samples. Discordant results were arbitrated by using an in-house, real-time PCR assay that was developed and validated by a public health reference laboratory. Following analyses of the discrepant specimens by PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of both the Premier CAMPY and ProSpecT Campylobacter EIAs were 99.3% and 98%, respectively, while the ImmunoCard STAT! CAMPY test had a sensitivity of 98.5% and a specificity of 98.2%. By use of the PCR test as the reference standard, culture detected 127 of 135
Campylobacter
-positive stool specimens, yielding a sensitivity of 94.1%. These results showed that the three EIAs evaluated in this study provide a rapid and reliable alternative for the laboratory diagnosis of enteric infections with
C. jejuni
and
C. coli
and that conventional culture may no longer be recognized as the “gold standard” for diagnosis.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference36 articles.
1. Adedayo, O., and B. D. Kirkpatrick. 2008. Campylobacter jejuni infections: update on presentation, diagnosis, and management. Hosp. Physician 44 : 9-15.
2. Campylobacter jejuni Infections: Update on Emerging Issues and Trends
3. Blaser, M., and B. M. Allos. 2005. Campylobacter jejuni and related species, p. 2548-2557. In G. Mandell, J. E. Bennet, and R. Dolin (ed.), Principles and practice of infectious disease, 6th ed. Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY.
4. A selective medium for isolating Campylobacter jejuni/coli.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2009. Preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food—10 states, 2008. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 58 : 333-337.
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献