Affiliation:
1. Infectious Diseases Research, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois 60064-3500, USA. angela.nilius@abbott.com
Abstract
The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) methods for susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae in Haemophilus test medium allow a pH range of 7.2 to 7.4. However, it is known that bacteria may appear to be less susceptible to macrolides at lower pHs. Forty-four strains of H. influenzae were tested for their susceptibilities to clarithromycin and azithromycin by the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods. The isolates appeared to be less susceptible at pH 7.2 than at pH 7.4 by both methods. Clarithromycin was less active at pH 7.2 against 43% of the isolates by the disk diffusion method and against 52% of the isolates by the broth microdilution method. Similarly, azithromycin was less active at pH 7.2 against 41 and 45% of the isolates by the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods, respectively. Forty-two isolates were classified as clarithromycin susceptible and all isolates were classified as azithromycin susceptible by the disk diffusion method, regardless of the medium pH. However, only 21 isolates were clarithromycin susceptible at pH 7.2 and 34 isolates were susceptible at pH 7.4 by the broth microdilution method, even though quality control results indicated valid testing at both pHs. This study indicated that the results of tests of the susceptibility of H. influenzae with clarithromycin and azithromycin are highly dependent on the pH of the medium. Test results and their interpretations varied even when the medium pH was within the NCCLS-approved range and, coupled with the current NCCLS breakpoint of 8 microg/ml in the case of clarithromycin, may explain some of the observed discordances between the disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference13 articles.
1. Variability of clarithromycin and erythromycin susceptibility tests with Haemophilus influenzae in four different broth media and correlation with the standard disk diffusion test;Barry A. L.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1988
2. Relative potencies of azithromycin, clarithromycin, and five other orally administered antibiotics;Barry A. L.;J. Antimicrob. Chemother.,1995
3. Reassessment of methods for testing the susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to clarithromycin;Barry A. L.;J. Antimicrob. Chemother.,1996
4. In vitro susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: review of new National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommendations;Doern G. V.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1992
5. Erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin: use of frequency distribution curves, scattergrams, and regression analyses to compare in vitro activities and describe cross-resistance;Fass R. J.;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1993
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献