Author:
Gill V J,Zierdt C H,Wu T C,Stock F,Pizzo P A,MacLowry J D
Abstract
Evaluation of a commercially available lysis-centrifugation blood culture system (Isolator, DuPont Co., Wilmington, Del.) and a lysis-filtration blood culture system for 3,111 cultures showed that both methods had comparable recoveries (73 and 68%, respectively) of significant aerobic and facultatively anaerobic isolates. The unvented conventional blood culture bottle had a recovery rate of 59%. Although the lysis-centrifugation and lysis-filtration systems had comparable recoveries of pathogens, the lysis-centrifugation system had the advantage of having colonies immediately available for further testing. The contamination rate with the lysis-centrifugation system was 3%, compared with 6% with the lysis-filtration system and 0.4% with brain heart infusion.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference15 articles.
1. College of American Pathologists. 1984. Manual for laboratory workload recording method p. 76. Workload Recording Committee Skokie Ill.
2. New centrifugation blood culture device;Dorn G. L.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1978
3. Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the Isolator Iysis-centrifugation blood culture tube;Henry N. K.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1983
4. Rapid automated diagnosis of bacteremia by impedance detection;Kagan R. L.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1977
5. Evaluation of a Iysis-centrifugation and biphasic bottle blood culture system during routine use;Kelly M. T.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1983
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献