Differences in susceptibilities of species of the Bacteroides fragilis group to several beta-lactam antibiotics: indole production as an indicator of resistance

Author:

Jenkins S G,Birk R J,Zabransky R J

Abstract

Clinical isolates of the members of the Bacteroides fragilis group differ markedly in their susceptibilities to a variety of beta-lactam antibiotics, including cefoperazone, moxalactam, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, cefamandole, cephalothin, cefazolin, and carbenicillin, as determined by dilution techniques. The minimum concentrations required to inhibit at least 50% of the strains tested (MIC50) for the entire B. fragilis group were lowest with moxalactam and cefoxitin, 4 and 8 micrograms/ml, respectively, whereas the MIC90S of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, moxalactam, cefoxitin, and carbenicillin were equivalent (64 micrograms/ml); the MIC90S of cefamandole, cephalothin, and cefazolin were higher. Indole-positive members of the group (B. ovatus, B. thetaiotaomicron, and B. uniformis) were significantly more resistant to every antibiotic tested than were indole-negative members (B. fragilis, B. distasonis, and B. vulgatus). In a 6-month survey of clinical laboratory data, indole-positive strains comprised 40% of the B. fragilis group isolates and 22% of all Bacteroides isolates; B. fragilis was the most common species isolated (23%). The increased use of second-generation and the introduction of third-generation cephalosporins may dictate that clinical microbiology laboratories routinely identify members of the B. fragilis group as to species or, alternatively, test for indole production in addition to performing more extensive susceptibility testing.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Reference25 articles.

1. In vitro activity of LY 127935;Barza M.;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1979

2. In vitro activity of N-formimidoyl thienamycin, moxalactam, and other new beta-lactam agents against Bacteroides fragilis: contribution of beta-lactamase to resistance;Brown J. E.;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1981

3. Evaluation of a direct fluorescent antibody staining method for rapid identification of the Bacteroidesfragilis group;De Giroain P. C.;Am. J. Clin. Pathol.,1981

4. Antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria with special reference to Bacteroides fragilis;Dornbusch K.;Scand. J. Infect. Dis.,1979

5. Dowel V. R. Jr. and T. M. Hawkins. 1977. Laboratory methods in anaerobic bacteriology. CDC Laboratory Manual. Department of Health Education and Welfare Publication (CDC) 78-8272 Centers for Disease Control Atlanta Ga.

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3