Affiliation:
1. Great Lakes Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Porter, Indiana 46304
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Studies on solar inactivation of
Escherichia coli
in freshwater and in situ have been limited. At 63rd St. Beach, Chicago, Ill., factors influencing the daily periodicity of culturable
E. coli
, particularly insolation, were examined. Water samples for
E. coli
analysis were collected twice daily between April and September 2000 three times a week along five transects in two depths of water. Hydrometeorological conditions were continuously logged: UV radiation, total insolation, wind speed and direction, wave height, and relative lake level. On 10 days, transects were sampled hourly from 0700 to 1500 h. The effect of sunlight on
E. coli
inactivation was evaluated with dark and transparent in situ mesocosms and ambient lake water. For the study, the number of
E. coli
samples collected (
n
) was 2,676. During sunny days,
E. coli
counts decreased exponentially with day length and exposure to insolation, but on cloudy days,
E. coli
inactivation was diminished; the
E. coli
decay rate was strongly influenced by initial concentration. In situ experiments confirmed that insolation primarily inactivated
E. coli
; UV radiation only marginally affected
E. coli
concentration. The relationship between insolation and
E. coli
density is complicated by relative lake level, wave height, and turbidity, all of which are often products of wind vector. Continuous importation and nighttime replenishment of
E. coli
were evident. These findings (i) suggest that solar inactivation is an important mechanism for natural reduction of indicator bacteria in large freshwater bodies and (ii) have implications for management strategies of nontidal waters and the use of
E. coli
as an indicator organism.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference27 articles.
1. Alm, E. W., J. Burke, and A. Spain. 2003. Fecal indicator bacteria are abundant in wet sand at freshwater beaches. Water Res.37:3978-3982.
2. American Public Health Association. 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 20th ed. American Public Health Association Washington D.C.
3. Barcina, I., I. Arana, J. Iriberri, and L. Egea. 1986. Influence of light and natural microbiota of the Burton River on E. coli survival. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 52:555-566.
4. Boehm, A. B., S. B. Grant, J. H. Kim, S. L. Mowbray, C. D. McGee, C. D. Clark, D. M. Foley, and D. E. Wellman. 2002. Decadal and shorter period variability of surf zone water quality at Huntington Beach, California. Environ. Sci. Technol.36:3885-3892.
5. Bordalo, A. A., W. Nilsumranchit, and K. Chalermwat. 2001. Water quality of the Bangpakong River (Eastern Thailand). Water Res.35:3635-3642.
Cited by
190 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献