Author:
Frongillo R F,Galuppo L,Moretti A
Abstract
We report the results obtained in comparative study on the extravascular passage of cefotaxime, employing three different methods: suction skin blister, skin window, and skin chamber. Applying the skin blister method in two different ways, we also studied the influence that suction pressure and time lapse between blister formation and antibiotic injection had on the results obtained in order to standardize the method and establish repeatability of the results. Using the skin chamber method, we studied the influence that the different protein contents in the fluid used to fill the skin chamber had on extravascular concentrations.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Reference10 articles.
1. Simplified, accurate method for antibiotic assay of clinical specimens;Bennett J. V.;Appl. Microbiol.,1966
2. In vitro activity of 6 cephalosporins cephalothin, cephradine, cephacetrile, cefaclor, cefuroxime and cefotaxime;Bianchi P.;Boil. Ist. Sieroter. Milan.,1979
3. Concentrations of antibiotics in renal interstitial fluid, soft tissue interstitial fluid, urine and serum;Eickenberg H. U.;Infection,1976
4. Penetration of four cephalosporins into tissue fluid in man;Gillett A. P.;Lancet,1978
5. Comparative clinical pharmacology of amoxicillin and ampicillin administered orally;Gordon R. C.;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1972
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献