Examination of Taxonomic Uncertainties Surrounding Brucella abortus bv. 7 by Phenotypic and Molecular Approaches

Abstract

ABSTRACTBrucellataxonomy is perpetually being reshuffled, at both the species and intraspecies levels. Biovar 7 ofBrucella abortuswas suspended from theApproved Lists of Bacterial NamesBrucellaclassification in 1988, because of unpublished evidence that the reference strain 63/75 was a mixture ofB. abortusbiovars 3 and 5. To formally clarify the situation, all isolates previously identified asB. abortusbv. 7 in the AHVLA and ANSES strain collections were characterized by classical microbiological and multiple molecular approaches. Among the 14 investigated strains, including strain 63/75, only four strains, isolated in Kenya, Turkey, and Mongolia, were pure and showed a phenotypic profile in agreement with the former biovar 7, particularly agglutination with both anti-A/anti-M monospecific sera. These results were strengthened by molecular strategies. Indeed, genus- and species-specific methods allowed confirmation that the four pure strains belonged to theB. abortusspecies. The combination of most approaches excluded their affiliation with the recognized biovars (biovars 1 to 6 and 9), while some suggested that they were close to biovar 3.These assays were complemented by phylogenetic and/or epidemiological methods, such as multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) and variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis. The results of this polyphasic investigation allow us to propose the reintroduction of biovar 7 into theBrucellaclassification, with at least three representative strains. Interestingly, the Kenyan strain, sharing the same biovar 7 phenotype, was genetically divergent from other three isolates. These discrepancies illustrate the complexity ofBrucellataxonomy. This study suggests that worldwide collections could include strains misidentified asB. abortusbv. 7, and it highlights the need to verify their real taxonomic position.