Affiliation:
1. Institute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Abstract
Examination of the activity of cefoperazone against ampicillin-resistant, gramnegative bacteria in agar dilution and simultaneously in broth dilution revealed that strains could be divided into three classes: class I strains were susceptible in agar (mean minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC], 0.5 mg/liter) as well as in broth dilution (mean MIC, 1.5 mg/liter), class II strains were susceptible in agar (MIC, 0.9 mg/liter), but resistant in broth dilution (MIC, 182 mg/liter); and class III strains were highly resistant in both test systems. Among 100 randomly selected ampicillin-resistant
Escherichia coli
cultures, 51 belonged to class I and 49 belonged to class II. Class III
E. coli
strains were much rarer. Similar results were obtained with cefamandole and cephalothin, but not with six other second-and third-generation cephalosporins. MICs of cefoperazone against cultures of all three classes were influenced by initial inoculum size. The inoculum effect was greatest with class II strains. Examination of bactericidal activity by cefoperazone showed killing of class I and class II
E. coli
strains and of class III strains of other genera during the first hours of incubation and regrowth after the drug was destroyed by the action of TEM β-lactamase (penicillinase). Representative class I bacteria produced 10 to 100 times less TEM β-lactamase than did class II strains. It appeared that the quantitative difference in TEM production was the reason for the different resistance phenotypes in class I and class II strains.
Salmonella
and
Klebsiella
strains of class III produced the same amounts of TEM β-lactamase as did class II
E. coli
strains. Probably, some factors other than β-lactamase contributed to the class III phenotype in these species.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Reference28 articles.
1. In vitro evaluation of cefoxitin and cefamandole;Adam H. G.;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1976
2. Atkon B. A. 1980. Species incidence trends of susceptibility to antibiotics in the United States and minimum inhibitory concentration p. 607-722. In V. Lorian (ed.) Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. Williams & Wilkins Co. Baltimore.
3. Barry A. L. and C. Thornsberry. 1980. Susceptibility testing: diffusion test procedures p. 463-474. In E. H. Lennette A. Balows W. J. Hausler Jr. and J. P. Truant (ed.) Manual of clinical microbiology 3rd ed. American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C.
4. Natural and acquired resistance of Klebsiella-Aerobacter to cephalothin and cephaloridine;Bener E. J. J.;Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.,1965
5. Simplified, accurate method for antibiotic assay of clinical specimens;Bennett J. V.;Appl. Microbiol.,1966
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献