Enzyme immunoassay for Q fever: comparison with complement fixation and immunofluorescence tests and dot immunoblotting

Abstract

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for the detection of specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies were developed by using purified Coxiella burnetii cells. Variables, including type of microtiter plate, blocking agent, incubation conditions, antigen stability, and substrate type, were examined to achieve optimal ELISA performance. The reliabilities of the assay systems were compared with those of complement fixation (CF) and enhanced immunofluorescence (EIF) tests with 600 human serum samples from defined clinical cases of Q fever, routine samples, and serum specimens from farmers. ELISA and EIF test results agreed in all cases. Dot immunoblotting was also used to test some of these sera and gave a rapid, qualitative result, which agreed with ELISA and EIF test results in all cases. No instances were found in which both ELISA and EIF test results were negative and the CF test results was positive. However approximately 5% of the sera were positive by ELISA and the EIF test while the CF test result was either negative or unreadable because of serum anticomplementary activity. We conclude that dot immunoblotting is a useful screening test, whereas ELISA and the EIF test are both rapid and sensitive tests when used for the serodiagnosis of Q fever and should be considered to be replacements for the CF test.