Author:
Barry A L,Preston D A,Jones R N,Gavan T L,Thornsberry C
Abstract
In vitro evaluation of two types of moxalactam disks revealed significant performance differences when Staphylococcus aureus was being tested. The differences were traced to the amount of decarboxylated moxalactam present in the disks. The decarboxylated analog was much more active than the parent compound against S. aureus, not active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and approximately as active as the parent compound against Escherichia coli. A nine-laboratory coordinated study was performed to establish quality control parameters for 30-micrograms moxalactam disks. Problems with the establishment of interpretive standards for moxalactam disk tests were evaluated in the light of differences between disks utilized in earlier studies and those that are now commercially available. The type of disk greatly influences standards for tests with S. aureus but has insignificant influence on testing gram-negative bacilli.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference17 articles.
1. Azlocillin, a ureido penicillin active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: interpretive zone standards and quality control parameters for tests with 75-,ug disks;Barry A. L.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1982
2. In vitro evaluation of LY 127935 (6059-S) compared with cefotaxime, eight P-lactams and two aminoglycosides;Barry A. L.;J. Antimicrob. Chemother.,1980
3. Tentative interpretive standards for disk susceptibility tests with moxalactam (LY127935);Barry A. L.;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1980
4. In vitro activity of LY127935;Barza M.;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1979
5. The comparative ,Blactamase resistance and inhibitory activity of 1-oxa cephalosporin, cefoxitin and cefotaxime;Fu K. P.;J. Antibiot. (Tokyo),1979
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献