Affiliation:
1. Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
2. Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, Kansas, 66506
3. INTHERES, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Toulouse, France
4. Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Optimization of antimicrobial treatment is a cornerstone in the fight against antimicrobial resistance. Various national and international authorities and professional veterinary and farming associations have released generic guidelines on prudent antimicrobial use in animals. However, these generic guidelines need to be translated into a set of animal species- and disease-specific practice recommendations. This article focuses on prevention of antimicrobial resistance and its complex relationship with treatment efficacy, highlighting key situations where the current antimicrobial drug products, treatment recommendations, and practices may be insufficient to minimize antimicrobial selection. The authors address this topic using a multidisciplinary approach involving microbiology, pharmacology, clinical medicine, and animal husbandry. In the first part of the article, we define four key targets for implementing the concept of optimal antimicrobial treatment in veterinary practice: (i) reduction of overall antimicrobial consumption, (ii) improved use of diagnostic testing, (iii) prudent use of second-line, critically important antimicrobials, and (iv) optimization of dosage regimens. In the second part, we provided practice recommendations for achieving these four targets, with reference to specific conditions that account for most antimicrobial use in pigs (intestinal and respiratory disease), cattle (respiratory disease and mastitis), dogs and cats (skin, intestinal, genitourinary, and respiratory disease), and horses (upper respiratory disease, neonatal foal care, and surgical infections). Lastly, we present perspectives on the education and research needs for improving antimicrobial use in the future.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Cell Biology,Microbiology (medical),Genetics,General Immunology and Microbiology,Ecology,Physiology
Reference257 articles.
1. World Health Organization (WHO). 2015. AMR: draft global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. http://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/global-action-plan/en/.
2. Review on Antimicrobial Resistance. 2015. Antimicrobials in agriculture and the environment: reducing unnecessary use and waste. https://amr-review.org/sites/default/files/Antimicrobials%20in%20agriculture%20and%20the%20environment%20-%20Reducing%20unnecessary%20use%20and%20waste.pdf.
3. European Commission. 2017. EU One Health action plan against AMR. https://ec.europa.eu/health/amr/.
4. European Medicines Agency (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP) and EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). 2017. EMA and EFSA Joint Scientific Opinion on measures to reduce the need to use antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry in the European Union and the resulting impacts on food safety (RONAFA). EFSA J 15: 4666.
5. European Commission. 2015. Commission notice. Guidelines for the prudent use of antimicrobials in veterinary medicine. Commission notice 2015/C 299/04. http://ec.europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/antimicrobial_resistance/docs/2015_prudent_use_guidelines_en.pdf.