Randomized Comparison of Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus Oxacillin-Dicloxacillin for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Author:

Stevens Dennis L.12,Smith Leon G.3,Bruss Jon B.4,McConnell-Martin Maureen A.4,Duvall Sue E.4,Todd Wesley Mark4,Hafkin Barry4

Affiliation:

1. Infectious Diseases Section, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Boise, Idaho1;

2. University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington2;

3. Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey3; and

4. Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Michigan4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of linezolid, an oxazolidinone, with those of oxacillin-dicloxacillin in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections. A total of 826 hospitalized adult patients were randomized to receive linezolid (600 mg intravenously [i.v.]) every 12 h or oxacillin (2 g i.v.) every 6 h; following sufficient clinical improvement, patients were switched to the respective oral agents (linezolid [600 mg orally] every 12 h or dicloxacillin [500 mg orally] every 6 hours). Primary efficacy variables were clinical cure rates in both the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and clinically evaluable (CE) patients and microbiological success rate in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients. Safety and tolerability were evaluated in the ITT population. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups in the 819 ITT patients. In the ITT population, the clinical cure rates were 69.8 and 64.9% in the linezolid and oxacillin-dicloxacillin groups, respectively ( P = 0.141; 95% confidence interval −1.58 to 11.25). In 298 CE linezolid-treated patients, the clinical cure rate was 88.6%, compared with a cure rate of 85.8% in 302 CE patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. In 143 ME linezolid-treated patients, the microbiological success rate was 88.1%, compared with a success rate of 86.1% in 151 ME patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. Both agents were well tolerated; most adverse events were of mild-to-moderate intensity. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported in the linezolid group. These data support the use of linezolid for the treatment of adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Reference31 articles.

1. Current concepts: streptococcal infections of skin and soft tissues.;Bisno A. L.;N. Engl. J. Med.,1996

2. Oxazolidinone antibacterial agents.;Brickner S. J.;Curr. Pharm. Des.,1996

3. Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin—United States, 1997.;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.,1997

4. Update: Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin—United States, 1997.;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.,1997

5. Analysis of antibiotic susceptibilities of skin wound flora in hospitalized dermatology patients. The crisis of antibiotic resistance has come to the surface.;Colsky A. S.;Arch. Dermatol.,1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3