Affiliation:
1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
2. Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The prevalence of the currently known
Acinetobacter
species and related trends of antimicrobial resistance in a Dutch university hospital were studied. Between 1999 and 2006,
Acinetobacter
isolates from clinical samples were collected prospectively. Isolates were analyzed by amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting. For species identification, a profile similarity cutoff level of 50% was used, and for strain identification, a cutoff level of 90% was used. Susceptibility for antimicrobial agents was tested by disk diffusion by following the CLSI guideline. The incidences of
Acinetobacter
isolates ranged from 1.7 to 3.7 per 10,000 patients per year, without a trend of increase, during the study years. Twenty different species were distinguished.
Acinetobacter baumannii
(27%) and
Acinetobacter
genomic species (gen. sp.) 3 (26%) were the most prevalent. Other species seen relatively frequently were
Acinetobacter lwoffii
(11%),
Acinetobacter ursingii
(4%),
Acinetobacter johnsonii
(4%), and
Acinetobacter junii
(3%). One large cluster of
A. baumannii
, involving 31 patients, and 16 smaller clusters of various species, involving in total 39 patients, with at most 5 patients in 1 cluster, occurred. Overall, 37% of the
A. baumannii
isolates were fully susceptible to the tested antibiotics. There was a borderline significant (
P
= 0.059) trend of decreasing susceptibility.
A. baumannii
was the
Acinetobacter
species causing the largest burden of multiple-antibiotic resistance and transmissions in the hospital.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference28 articles.
1. Bernards, A. T., A. J. de Beaufort, L. Dijkshoorn, and C. P. van Boven. 1997. Outbreak of septicaemia in neonates caused by Acinetobacter junii investigated by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) and four typing methods. J. Hosp. Infect.35:129-140.
2. Bernards, A. T., H. I. Harinck, L. Dijkshoorn, T. van der Reijden, and P. J. van den Broek. 2004. Persistent Acinetobacter baumannii? Look inside your medical equipment. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.25:1002-1004.
3. Boo, T. W., F. Walsh, and B. Crowley. 2009. Molecular characterization of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter species in an Irish university hospital: predominance of Acinetobacter genomic species 3. J. Med. Microbiol.58:209-216.
4. Bouvet, P. J. M., and P. A. D. Grimont. 1986. Taxonomy of the genus Acinetobacter with the recognition of Acinetobacter baumannii sp. nov., Acinetobacter haemolyticus sp. nov., Acinetobacter johnsonii sp. nov., and Acinetobacter junii sp. nov. and emended descriptions of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Acinetobacter lwoffii. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.36:228-240.
5. de la Tabla Ducasse, V. O., C. M. Gonzalez, J. A. Saez-Nieto, and F. Gutierrez. 2008. First case of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography bacteraemia caused by Acinetobacter ursingii in a patient with choledocholithiasis and cholangitis. J. Med. Microbiol.57:1170-1171.
Cited by
63 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献