Abstract
Two commercially available micromethod multitest systems (API, Analytab Products, Inc., Minitek-Bioquest) were compared with conventional tests suggested by the Center for Disease Control for the identification of anaerobes. Anaerobiosis for the microsystems was achieved using GasPak system (BBL), A total of 175 anaerobes, including 158 clinical isolates and 17 reference strains, were used. Gram morphology, gas-liquid chromatography data, and biochemical reactions from the Center for Disease Control and Virginia Polytechnic Institute anaerobic manuals were used to identify the organisms. The Minitek system included a new anaerobe inoculum broth and two new disks, dextrose without nitrate and nitrate reductase disks. The percentage of correlation of 12 biochemicals using Minitek and 11 biochemicals using the API were compared with the Center for Disease Control reactions. The percentage of correlation of both positive and negative reactions with the API anaerobic strip ranged from 70.8 to 99.4% and with the Minitek from 97.1 to 100%. The microsystems were also evaluated as to the ease of use, adaptabilty to a clinical laboratory, time, and cost.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference10 articles.
1. A practical approach to anaerobic bacteriology for clinical laboratories;Barlett J. G.;Technical Improvement Service, American Society of Clinical Pathologists.,1975
2. Dowell V. R. Jr. and T. M. Hawkins. 1974. Laboratory methods in anaerobic bacteriology. Center for Disease Control Atlanta Ga.
3. UCLA conference. Management of anaerobic infections;Finegold S. W.;Ann. Intern. Med.,1975
4. Medical progress: anaerobic infections;Gorbach S. L.;N. Engl. J. Med.,1974
5. Holdeman L. V. and W. E. C. Moore. 1975. Anaerobe laboratory manual. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献