Affiliation:
1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de la Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
Abstract
The definitive diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is made by a positive ascitic fluid culture. Causative organisms cannot be isolated in up to 65% of patients with well-defined spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, probably due to inadequate ascites culture techniques. We prospectively compared two ascites culture methods: conventional (on chocolate agar and thioglycolate broth) and modified (inoculation of 10 ml of ascites in a tryptic soy broth blood culture bottle at the patient's bedside). In a 10-month period, 31 cirrhotic patients met our diagnostic criteria for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; both culture methods were performed on their ascitic fluid. The conventional method grew bacteria in only 16 of the 31 episodes (52%), whereas the modified method grew bacteria in 25 (81%), a significantly higher sensitivity (P less than 0.05). The modified method also shortened significantly the time for detection of bacterial growth. We conclude that ascites inoculation into a blood culture bottle at the patient's bedside should be the routine method for ascites culture.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference15 articles.
1. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: variations on a theme;Conn H. O.;Medicine,1971
2. The diagnosis of bacterial peritonitis: comparison of pH, lactate concentration and leukocyte count;Garcia-Tsao G.;Hepatology,1985
3. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis;Hoefs J. C.;Hepatology,1982
4. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis;Hoefs J. C.;Disease-a-Month,1985
5. Isenberg H. D. J. A. Washington 11 A. Blows and A. C. Sonnenwirth. 1985. Collection handling and processing of specimens p. 73-97. In E. H. Lennette A. Balows W. J. Hausler Jr. and H. J. Shadomy (ed.) Manual of clinical microbiology 4th ed. American Society for Microbiology Washington D.C.
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献