Microbial Biodiversity: Approaches to Experimental Design and Hypothesis Testing in Primary Scientific Literature from 1975 to 1999

Author:

Morris Cindy E.1,Bardin Marc1,Berge Odile2,Frey-Klett Pascale3,Fromin Nathalie4,Girardin Hélène5,Guinebretière Marie-Hélène5,Lebaron Philippe6,Thiéry Jean M.7,Troussellier Marc8

Affiliation:

1. Station de Pathologie Végétale

2. CEA Cadarache, DSV DEVM LEMIR, UMR 163 CNRS-CEA, Univ-mediterranee, St Paul-Lez-Durance

3. UMR INRA-UHP Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, Centre INRA de Nancy, Nancy

4. Laboratoire de Microbiologie, University of NeuchÂtel, NeuchÂtel, Switzerland

5. Station de Technologie de Produits Végétaux, INRA, Avignon

6. University of Paris VI, UMR 7621 CNRS, Laboratoire ARAGO, Banyuls-sur-mere

7. ModLibre.org, Eguilles

8. Laboratoire Ecosystèmes Lagunaires, UMR 5119 CNRS-Université Montpellier II, Montpellier, France

Abstract

SUMMARY Research interest in microbial biodiversity over the past 25 years has increased markedly as microbiologists have become interested in the significance of biodiversity for ecological processes and as the industrial, medical, and agricultural applications of this diversity have evolved. One major challenge for studies of microbial habitats is how to account for the diversity of extremely large and heterogeneous populations with samples that represent only a very small fraction of these populations. This review presents an analysis of the way in which the field of microbial biodiversity has exploited sampling, experimental design, and the process of hypothesis testing to meet this challenge. This review is based on a systematic analysis of 753 publications randomly sampled from the primary scientific literature from 1975 to 1999 concerning the microbial biodiversity of eight habitats related to water, soil, plants, and food. These publications illustrate a dominant and growing interest in questions concerning the effect of specific environmental factors on microbial biodiversity, the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of this biodiversity, and quantitative measures of population structure for most of the habitats covered here. Nevertheless, our analysis reveals that descriptions of sampling strategies or other information concerning the representativeness of the sample are often missing from publications, that there is very limited use of statistical tests of hypotheses, and that only a very few publications report the results of multiple independent tests of hypotheses. Examples are cited of different approaches and constraints to experimental design and hypothesis testing in studies of microbial biodiversity. To prompt a more rigorous approach to unambiguous evaluation of the impact of microbial biodiversity on ecological processes, we present guidelines for reporting information about experimental design, sampling strategies, and analyses of results in publications concerning microbial biodiversity.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Molecular Biology,Microbiology,Infectious Diseases

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3