Comparison of Direct and Standardized Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Positive Blood Cultures

Author:

Johnson James E.1,Washington John A.1

Affiliation:

1. Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55901

Abstract

In an effort to determine the feasibility and accuracy of performing direct susceptibility tests from positive blood cultures, minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), determined by the agar dilution method, of direct and standardized tests with seven antibiotics were compared. Results were analyzed as to the number of very major (change in MIC from susceptible in preliminary direct testing to resistant in final standardized testing), major (change in MIC from resistant to susceptible), and minor (change in MIC without change in interpretation) discrepancies. The results for gram-positive cocci and for gram-negative bacilli were 5, 6, and 82 of 162 strains tested and 3, 12, and 79 of 90 strains tested, respectively. Of the total number of susceptibility tests compared, major and very major discrepancies occurred in only 1 and 2.4% of instances with gram-positive and -negative isolates, respectively. The majority of discrepancies were noted withStaphylococcus epidermidis(four very major, five major),Klebsiella(two very major, four major), andAlcaligenes(five major). The antibiotics most often exhibiting discrepancies were penicillin, ampicillin, and cephalothin. The results indicate that preliminary susceptibility testing directly from positive blood culture bottles is generally both feasible and accurate.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology

Reference8 articles.

1. Rapid determination of antimicrobial susceptibility for urgent clinical situations;Barry A. L.;Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 59:.693-699.,1973

2. Bartlett R. C. 1973. Contemporary blood culture practices p. 15-35. In A. C. Sonnenwirth (ed.) Bacteremia: laboratory and clinical aspects. Charles C Thomas Publisher Springfield Ill.

3. Bartlett R. C. C. Fitzgerald R. Maggio D. Miller R. Quintiliani J. Redys G. Thornton A. von Graevenitz and W. Vincent. 1975. Report of the ad hoc committee on medical microbiology laboratory utilization. Conn. Med. 39:.499-505.

4. Effects ofatmosphere of incubation and ofroutine subcultures on detection of bacteremia in vacuum blood culture bottles;Harkness J. L.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1975

5. Comparison of direct and standardized disk diffusion susceptibility testing of urine cultures;Hollick G. E.;Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,1976

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3