Author:
Pfaller M. A.,Espinel-Ingroff A.,Bustamante B.,Canton E.,Diekema D. J.,Fothergill A.,Fuller J.,Gonzalez G. M.,Guarro J.,Lass-Flörl C.,Lockhart S. R.,Martin-Mazuelos E.,Meis J. F.,Ostrosky-Zeichner L.,Pelaez T.,St-Germain G.,Turnidge J.
Abstract
ABSTRACTSince epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) using CLSI MICs from multiple laboratories are not available forCandidaspp. and the echinocandins, we established ECVs for anidulafungin and micafungin on the basis of wild-type (WT) MIC distributions (for organisms in a species-drug combination with no detectable acquired resistance mechanisms) for 8,210Candida albicans, 3,102C. glabrata, 3,976C. parapsilosis, 2,042C. tropicalis, 617C. krusei, 258C. lusitaniae, 234C. guilliermondii, and 131C. dubliniensisisolates. CLSI broth microdilution MIC data gathered from 15 different laboratories in Canada, Europe, Mexico, Peru, and the United States were aggregated to statistically define ECVs. ECVs encompassing 97.5% of the statistically modeled population for anidulafungin and micafungin were, respectively, 0.12 and 0.03 μg/ml forC. albicans, 0.12 and 0.03 μg/ml forC. glabrata, 8 and 4 μg/ml forC. parapsilosis, 0.12 and 0.06 μg/ml forC. tropicalis, 0.25 and 0.25 μg/ml forC. krusei, 1 and 0.5 μg/ml forC. lusitaniae, 8 and 2 μg/ml forC. guilliermondii, and 0.12 and 0.12 μg/ml forC. dubliniensis. Previously reported single and multicenter ECVs defined in the present study were quite similar or within 1 2-fold dilution of each other. For a collection of 230 WT isolates (nofksmutations) and 51 isolates withfksmutations, the species-specific ECVs for anidulafungin and micafungin correctly classified 47 (92.2%) and 51 (100%) of thefksmutants, respectively, as non-WT strains. These ECVs may aid in detecting non-WT isolates with reduced susceptibility to anidulafungin and micafungin due tofksmutations.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology