Clostridium difficile Strains from Community-Associated Infections-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clostridium difficile Strains from Community-Associated Infections

Published:2009-09 Issue:9 Volume:47 Page:3004-3007
ISSN:0095-1137
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Microbiology
language:en
Short-container-title:J Clin Microbiol

Author:

Limbago Brandi M.¹,Long Cherie M.²,Thompson Angela D.¹,Killgore George E.¹,Hannett George E.³,Havill Nancy L.⁴,Mickelson Stephanie⁵,Lathrop Sarah⁶,Jones Timothy F.⁷,Park Mahin M.⁸,Harriman Kathleen H.⁹,Gould L. Hannah¹⁰,McDonald L. Clifford¹,Angulo Frederick J.¹⁰

Affiliation:

1. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

2. Atlanta Research and Education Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia

3. Wadsworth Center, New York State Health Department, Albany, New York

4. Hospital of Saint Raphael, New Haven, Connecticut

5. Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore, Maryland

6. University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico

7. Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee

8. Georgia Public Health Laboratory, Atlanta, Georgia

9. Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota

10. Divison of Foodborne, Bacterial, and Mycotic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Clostridium difficile isolates from presumed community-associated infections ( n = 92) were characterized by toxinotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, tcdC and cdtB PCR, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Nine toxinotypes (TOX) and 31 PFGE patterns were identified. TOX 0 (48, 52%), TOX III (18, 20%), and TOX V (9, 10%) were the most common; three isolates were nontoxigenic.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

Link

https://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/JCM.00964-09

Reference22 articles.

1. Development of a rapid and efficient restriction endonuclease analysis typing system for Clostridium difficile and correlation with other typing systems

2. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria; approved standard—7th edition. 2007

3. Dial, S., J. A. Delaney, A. N. Barkun, and S. Suissa. 2005. Use of gastric acid-suppressive agents and the risk of community-acquired Clostridium difficile-associated disease. JAMA294:2989-2995.

4. Selective and differential medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile

5. Geric, B., R. J. Carman, M. Rupnik, C. W. Genheimer, S. P. Sambol, D. M. Lyerly, D. N. Gerding, and S. Johnson. 2006. Binary toxin-producing, large clostridial toxin-negative Clostridium difficile strains are enterotoxic but do not cause disease in hamsters. J. Infect. Dis.193:1143-1150.

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Frequency of Antibiotic-Resistant Clostridium Species in Saudi Arabia;Antibiotics;2022-08-29

2. Virulence Factors Associated with Clostridiodes difficile: An Overview;Journal of Gastrointestinal Infections;2022-01-18

3. Antimicrobial Resistance in Clostridium and Brachyspira spp. and Other Anaerobes;Microbiology Spectrum;2020-01-16

4. Antimicrobial Resistance inClostridiumandBrachyspiraspp. and Other Anaerobes;Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacteria from Livestock and Companion Animals;2018-08-23

5. High prevalence ofClostridium difficileon retail root vegetables, Western Australia;Journal of Applied Microbiology;2018-01-22