Affiliation:
1. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Abstract
The bacteriologic and clinical efficacies of 3 days of lomefloxacin therapy were compared with those of 3 days of norfloxacin therapy for the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. One hundred sixty-four subjects were enrolled at five Canadian centers; 84 received lomefloxacin, and 80 received norfloxacin. Escherichia coli (84%) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (11%) were the most common organisms isolated. Forty subjects (24%) had low quantitative counts in their pretherapy urine specimens. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 76 lomefloxacin subjects (91%) and 76 norfloxacin subjects (95%) were cured or improved at follow-up 5 to 9 days posttreatment and 73 (87%) and 71 (89%) subjects from the lomefloxacin and norfloxacin groups, respectively, were cured or improved at 4 to 6 weeks posttreatment. Bacteriologic eradication occurred in 61 of 63 lomefloxacin subjects (97%) with > or = 10(8) CFU/liter in their pretherapy specimens and 56 of 59 norfloxacin subjects (95%) at 5 to 9 days and 55 (87%) and 53 (90%) subjects from the lomefloxacin and norfloxacin groups, respectively, at 4 to 6 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in outcome. Adverse effects which were potentially related to the study medications were reported by 26% of the subjects who received lomefloxacin and 25% of the subjects who received norfloxacin. There were no severe adverse events, and only one subject discontinued therapy. These data suggest that 3 days of therapy with either lomefloxacin or norfloxacin is effective in the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献