Affiliation:
1. Hospital Corporation of America, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
2. Texas A&M Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
3. University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
4. Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
5. University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
Abstract
SUMMARY
Colonization with health care-associated pathogens such as
Staphylococcus aureus
, enterococci, Gram-negative organisms, and
Clostridium difficile
is associated with increased risk of infection. Decolonization is an evidence-based intervention that can be used to prevent health care-associated infections (HAIs). This review evaluates agents used for nasal topical decolonization, topical (e.g., skin) decolonization, oral decolonization, and selective digestive or oropharyngeal decontamination. Although the majority of studies performed to date have focused on
S. aureus
decolonization, there is increasing interest in how to apply decolonization strategies to reduce infections due to Gram-negative organisms, especially those that are multidrug resistant. Nasal topical decolonization agents reviewed include mupirocin, bacitracin, retapamulin, povidone-iodine, alcohol-based nasal antiseptic, tea tree oil, photodynamic therapy, omiganan pentahydrochloride, and lysostaphin. Mupirocin is still the gold standard agent for
S. aureus
nasal decolonization, but there is concern about mupirocin resistance, and alternative agents are needed. Of the other nasal decolonization agents, large clinical trials are still needed to evaluate the effectiveness of retapamulin, povidone-iodine, alcohol-based nasal antiseptic, tea tree oil, omiganan pentahydrochloride, and lysostaphin. Given inferior outcomes and increased risk of allergic dermatitis, the use of bacitracin-containing compounds cannot be recommended as a decolonization strategy. Topical decolonization agents reviewed included chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), hexachlorophane, povidone-iodine, triclosan, and sodium hypochlorite. Of these, CHG is the skin decolonization agent that has the strongest evidence base, and sodium hypochlorite can also be recommended. CHG is associated with prevention of infections due to Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms as well as
Candida
. Conversely, triclosan use is discouraged, and topical decolonization with hexachlorophane and povidone-iodine cannot be recommended at this time. There is also evidence to support use of selective digestive decontamination and selective oropharyngeal decontamination, but additional studies are needed to assess resistance to these agents, especially selection for resistance among Gram-negative organisms. The strongest evidence for decolonization is for use among surgical patients as a strategy to prevent surgical site infections.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Immunology and Microbiology,Epidemiology
Reference176 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States 2013.
http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf
. Accessed 7 May 2015.
2. Multistate Point-Prevalence Survey of Health Care–Associated Infections
3. Economic burden of healthcare-associated infections: an American perspective
4. Health Care–Associated Infections
5. Scott RD. 2009. The direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in U.S. hospitals and the benefits of prevention.
http://www.cdc.gov/HAI/pdfs/hai/Scott_CostPaper.pdf
. Accessed 27 August 2015.