Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae

Author:

Swanson E C,Collins M T

Abstract

A total of 503 veterinary enteric bacterial pathogens obtained from state veterinary diagnostic laboratories were tested on API 20E strips to determine whether this rapid microidentification system could be utilized for veterinary clinical microbiology. The API 20E strip accurately identified 96% of the veterinary isolates and misidentified 3%. Identifications by the API system and the diagnostic laboratories were in agreement in 85% of the isolates, disagreement on 16% of the isolates, and 1% were not identified by the API strip. Differences in identification occurred primarily in distinguishing between Klebsiella and Enterobacter and between Enterobacter and Escherichia coli. These disagreements were most often due to incorrect identifications by the diagnostic laboratory rather than by the API system. Biotype differences between human and veterinary isolates were compared. Significant differences were noted in several biochemical reactions. The main differences observed for E. coli isolates were in ornithine decarboxylase production and melibiose fermentation. The largest differences for Salmonella occurred in arginine dihydrolase production, citrate utilization, and inositol fermentation, whereas for Klebsiella pneumoniae the main differences were noted in urease production and nitrate reduction. These biotype differences, however, did not affect the accurate identification of organisms on the API strip.

Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Subject

Microbiology (medical)

Reference12 articles.

1. A clinical evaluation of the API microtube system for identification of;Brooks K. A.;Enterobacteriaceae. Am. J. Med. Technol.,1974

2. Reproducibility of the Analytab (API 20E) system;Butler D. A.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1975

3. Biochemical typing of urinary Escherichia coli strains by means of the API 20E Enterobacteriaceae system;Davies D. I.;J. Med. Microbiol.,1977

4. Multiple biotypes of Klebsiella pneumoniae in single clinical specimens;DeSilva M. I.;J. Clin. Microbiol.,1977

5. A comparison of two commercial methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae-API 20E and the Enterotubewith conventional methods;Hayek L. J.;J. Clin. Pathol.,1976

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3