Affiliation:
1. Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
2. Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florian�polis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
3. National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Ecological sanitation technologies can be effective in providing health and environmental pollution control if they can efficiently reduce the pathogenicity of microorganisms carried in fecal material to safe levels. This study evaluated the sanitizing effects of different additives for dry treatment of feces from urine-diverting dry toilets, based on inactivation of
Enterococcus faecalis
,
Salmonella enterica
serovar Typhimurium, bacteriophages MS2 and ΦX, and
Ascaris suum
. The additives, ash (A) and oyster shell (O) in different amounts and urea (U) to optimize the process, were compared with no additive, solely urea, and sawdust as controls (C) and were covered ([
x
%O:A]) or uncovered (
x
%O:A). The main inactivation factors found were desiccation, ammonia content, and pH.
S.
Typhimurium and
E. faecalis
were more affected by the ammonia content. A combination of neutral to high pH and desiccation was most effective for inactivation of MS2, and desiccation was most effective for inactivation of ΦX and
A. suum
. The inactivation rate was modeled for all combinations studied. The most promising treatments were [150%O:A+U], 150%O:A+U, and 150%O:A. According to the models, these could inactivate, for example, 7 log
10
units of all bacteria and bacteriophages within 83, 125, and 183 days, respectively. The inactivation of
A. suum
was modeled, albeit the measured decay in egg viability was low.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference35 articles.
1. A new planning and design paradigm to achieve sustainable resource recovery from wastewater;Guest JS;Environ. Sci. Technol.,2009
2. Ecological sanitation: principles, technologies and project examples for sustainable wastewater and excreta management;Werner C;Desalination,2009
3. Anaerobic treatment in decentralised and source-separation-based sanitation concepts;Kujawa-Roeleveld K;Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol.,2006
4. Ecological sanitation—a way to solve global sanitation problems?;Langergrabera G;Environ. Int.,2005
5. Sch�nningCStenstr�mTA. 2004. Guidelines on the safe use of urine and faeces in ecological sanitation systems. EcoSanRes Programme and Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献