Affiliation:
1. Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Duke University Medical Center
2. Departments of Pathology
3. Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27710
4. Departments of Medicine
5. Microbiology Laboratory, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital
6. Pathology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey—Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Standard aerobic media are widely used for culturing blood with the BacT/ALERT (BioMérieux, Inc., Durham, N.C.) (BM) and BACTEC 9240 (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Md.) (BD) automated continuously monitoring instrument systems. Although similarly composed of soybean-casein digest broths, the formulations of the standard aerobic media available for these instruments differ from each other in supplements and in sodium polyanetholesulfonate concentration. Therefore, we compared the standard aerobic media available for these systems at two university hospitals. Blood samples from adult patients with suspected bloodstream infection were inoculated at the bedside into nonvented BM and BD standard aerobic blood culture bottles and incubated in their respective instruments. The laboratories received 6,743 pairs of bottles that were each filled with 8 to 12 ml of blood. A total of 523 isolates representing true infections were recovered from 257 patients; of these isolates, 348 were recovered from both the BD and the BM bottles, 108 were recovered from the BM bottles only, and 67 were recovered from the BD bottles only (
P
< 0.005). More staphylococci (
P
< 0.05), especially coagulase-negative staphylococci (
P
< 0.05), and yeasts (
P
< 0.01) were recovered from BM bottles than from BD bottles. Of 291 unimicrobial episodes of bloodstream infection, 220 were detected with both bottles, 41 were detected with the BM bottles only, and 30 were detected with the BD bottles only (difference not significant). Among 335 cultures that were positive in both bottles within the first 72 h of incubation, the median times to detection were 14 h for BM bottles and 13 h for BD bottles. Rates for false-positive results were 0.5% for BM bottles and 0.1% for BD bottles. One BM bottle and seven BD bottles yielded false-negative results. We conclude that the BM medium provides improved recovery of microorganisms, especially staphylococci and yeasts, compared with that provided by the BD medium.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference10 articles.
1. Clinical comparison of the isolator and BacT/Alert aerobic blood culture systems
2. McNemar Q. 1969. Psychological statistics. Wiley New York N.Y.
3. Murray P. R. E. J. Baron M. A. Pfaller F. C. Tenover and R. H. Yolken (ed.). 1995. Manual of clinical microbiology 6th ed. ASM Press Washington D.C.
4. NCCLS. 2002. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twelfth Informational Supplement. NCCLS Wayne Pa.
5. Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献