Characterization of Novel
Brucella
Strains Originating from Wild Native Rodent Species in North Queensland, Australia
-
Published:2010-09
Issue:17
Volume:76
Page:5837-5845
-
ISSN:0099-2240
-
Container-title:Applied and Environmental Microbiology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Appl Environ Microbiol
Author:
Tiller Rebekah V.1, Gee Jay E.1, Frace Michael A.1, Taylor Trevor K.2, Setubal Joao C.3, Hoffmaster Alex R.1, De Barun K.1
Affiliation:
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333 2. Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia 3. Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
Abstract
ABSTRACT
We report on the characterization of a group of seven novel
Brucella
strains isolated in 1964 from three native rodent species in North Queensland, Australia, during a survey of wild animals. The strains were initially reported to be
Brucella suis
biovar 3 on the basis of microbiological test results. Our results indicated that the rodent strains had microbiological traits distinct from those of
B. suis
biovar 3 and all other
Brucella
spp. To reinvestigate these rodent strains, we sequenced the 16S rRNA,
recA
, and
rpoB
genes and nine housekeeping genes and also performed multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA). The rodent strains have a unique 16S rRNA gene sequence compared to the sequences of the classical
Brucella
spp. Sequence analysis of the
recA
,
rpoB
, and nine housekeeping genes reveals that the rodent strains are genetically identical to each other at these loci and divergent from any of the currently described
Brucella
sequence types. However, all seven of the rodent strains do exhibit distinctive allelic MLVA profiles, although none demonstrated an amplicon for VNTR 07, whereas the other
Brucella
spp. did. Phylogenetic analysis of the MLVA data reveals that the rodent strains form a distinct clade separate from the classical
Brucella
spp. Furthermore, whole-genome sequence comparison using the maximal unique exact matches index (MUMi) demonstrated a high degree of relatedness of one of the seven rodent
Brucella
strains (strain NF 2653) to another Australian rodent
Brucella
strain (strain 83-13). Our findings strongly suggest that this group of
Brucella
strains isolated from wild Australian rodents defines a new species in the
Brucella
genus.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Ecology,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference50 articles.
1. Alton, G. G., L. M. Jones, and D. E. Pietz. 1975. Laboratory techniques in brucellosis. Monogr. Ser. World Health Org., p. 1-163. 2. Boeer, W. J., R. P. Crawford, R. J. Hidalgo, and R. M. Robinson. 1980. Small mammals and white-tailed deer as possible reservoir hosts of Brucella abortus in Texas. J. Wildl. Dis.16:19-24. 3. Boschiroli, M. L., V. Foulongne, and D. O'Callaghan. 2001. Brucellosis: a worldwide zoonosis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.4:58-64. 4. Chu, M. C., and R. S. Weyant. 2003. Francisella and Brucella, p. 789-808. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. A. Pfaller, and R. H. Yolken (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology,vol. 1, 8th ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC. 5. Cloeckaert, A., M. Grayon, O. Grepinet, and K. S. Boumedine. 2003. Classification of Brucella strains isolated from marine mammals by infrequent restriction site-PCR and development of specific PCR identification tests. Microbes Infect.5:593-602.
Cited by
89 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|