Affiliation:
1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology
2. Department of Biostatistics
3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Center for Orthopaedic Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Mutation of the staphylococcal accessory regulator (
sarA
) in
Staphylococcus aureus
limits but does not abolish the capacity of the organism to form a biofilm. As a first step toward determining whether this limitation is therapeutically relevant, we carried out in vitro studies comparing the relative susceptibility of an
S. aureus
clinical isolate (UAMS-1) and its isogenic
sarA
mutant (UAMS-929) in the specific context of a catheter-associated biofilm. The antibiotics tested were daptomycin, linezolid, and vancomycin, all of which were evaluated by using concentrations based on the MIC defined as the breakpoint for a susceptible strain of
S. aureus
(≤1.0, ≤2.0, and ≤4.0 μg/ml for daptomycin, vancomycin, and linezolid, respectively). Mutation of
sarA
had no significant impact on the MIC of UAMS-1 for any of the targeted antibiotics, as defined by Etest antimicrobial susceptibility testing. However, mutation of
sarA
did result in a significant increase in antimicrobial susceptibility to all targeted antibiotics when they were tested in the specific context of a biofilm. Additionally, whether susceptibility was assessed by using UAMS-1 or its
sarA
mutant, daptomycin was found to be more effective against established
S. aureus
biofilms than either linezolid or vancomycin.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology
Cited by
43 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献