Affiliation:
1. Sezione Microbiologia Applicata, Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale e Biotecnologie Agroambientali
2. Sezione Microbiologia
3. Sezione Clinica Malattie Infettive, Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Scienze Biochimiche, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The enormous improvement of molecular typing techniques for epidemiological and clinical studies has not always been matched by an equivalent effort in applying optimal criteria for the analysis of both phenotypic and molecular data. In spite of the availability of a large collection of statistical and phylogenetic methods, the vast majority of commercial packages are limited by using only the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean algorithm to construct trees and by considering electrophoretic pattern only as migration distances. The latter method has serious drawbacks when different runs (separate gels) of the same molecular analysis are to be compared. This work presents a multicenter comparison of three different systems of banding pattern analysis on random amplified polymorphic DNA, (GACA)
4
, and contour-clamped homogeneous electric field patterns from strains of
Cryptococcus neoformans
var.
neoformans
isolated in different clinical and geographical situations and a standard
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
strain employed as an outgroup. The systems considered were evaluated for their actual ability to(i) recognize identities, (ii) define complete differences (i.e., the ability to place
S. cerevisiae
out of the
C. neoformans
cluster), and (iii) estimate the extent of similarity among different strains. The ability to cluster strains according to the patient from which they were isolated was also evaluated. The results indicate that different algorithms do indeed produce divergent trees, both in overall topology and in clustering of individual strains, thus suggesting that care must be taken by individual investigators to use the most appropriate procedure and by the scientific community in defining a consensus system.
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Reference14 articles.
1. Blasi, E., A. Brozzetti, D. Francisci, R. Neglia, G. Cardinali, F. Bistoni, V. Vidotto, and F. Baldelli. 2001. Evidence for microevolution in a clinical case of recurrent Cryptococcus neoformans meningoencephalitis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.20:535-543.
2. Boekhout, T., A. van Belkum, A. C. Leenders, H. A. Verbrugh, P. Mukamurangwa, D. Swinne, and W. A. Scheffers. 1997. Molecular typing of Cryptococcus neoformans: taxonomic and epidemiological aspects. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.47:432-442.
3. Cardinali, G., G. Liti, and A. Martini. 2000. Non-radioactive dot-blot DNA reassociation for unequivocal yeast identification. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:931-936.
4. Critical Observations on Computerized Analysis of Banding Patterns with Commercial Software Packages
5. Cardinali, G., L. Pellegrini, and A. Martini. 1995. Improvement of chromosomal DNA extraction from different yeast species by analysis of single preparation steps. Yeast11:1027-1029.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献